The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants
Open accessAbstract
We conducted a comparative analysis to determine life history and ecological correlates of pollen limitation among 224 species of animal-pollinated flowering plants. To test predictions concerning the occurrence of pollen limitation, species were classified categorically for six life-history traits (self-compatible vs. self-incompatible, autogamous vs. non-autogamous, specialized vs. unspecialized floral morphology, nectariferous vs. nectarless, monocarpic vs. polycarpic, herbaceous vs. woody) and two ecological conditions (presence in open vs. forested habitats and temperate vs. tropical biomes). Pollen limitation of species in contrasting categories was compared using non-parametric tests (TIPs analysis) and phylogenetically-independent contrasts (PICs). The results of TIPs and PICs analyses were generally congruent, although fewer significant contrasts were evident with PICs, probably because of low statistical power. Overall the results suggest that the influence of phylogenetic history on the intensity of pollen limitation was not particularly strong. Nonetheless, significant variation in the degree of pollen limitation was demonstrated among seven angiosperm families suggesting some phylogenetic component to the phenomenon. With both TIPs and PICs, pollen limitation was less intense in self-compatible and autogamous species. TIPs analysis demonstrated that herbaceous, nectariferous, and temperate species were less likely to be pollen-limited, but using PICs this could only be corroborated for those that were self-incompatible. None of the traits were singularly unambiguous predictors of pollen limitation, possibly reflecting the stochastic nature of pollinator service.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The comparative method in evolutionary biology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5104 · Cited by 4,931
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants
Schmid, R., & Cronquist, A. (1995) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1222465 · Cited by 3,244
Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts
Garland, T., Harvey, P. H., & Ives, A. R. (1992) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 · Cited by 2,151
Phylogenetics of Seed Plants: An Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences from the Plastid Gene rbcL
Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Olmstead, R. G., Morgan, D., Les, D. H., Mishler, B. D., Duvall, M. R., Price, R. A., Hills, H. G., Qiu, Y.-L., et al. (1993) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.2307/2399846 · Cited by 2,032
Self-citationHandbook of experimental pollination biology
Jones, C. E., & Little, R. J. (1983) · Cited by 1,991
Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters
Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M., & Ollerton, J. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265575 · Cited by 1,934
Martins, E. P., & Hansen, T. F. (1997) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/286013 · Cited by 1,711
van Gelder, H. A. E. (1961) · The Two Reformations in the 16th Century · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-9562-1_10 · Cited by 1,652
Cited by
Aguilar, R., Ashworth, L., Galetto, L., & Aizen, M. A. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x · Cited by 1,079
In Posidonia oceanica cadmium induces changes in DNA methylation and chromatin patterning
Greco, M., Chiappetta, A., Bruno, L., & Bitonti, M. B. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err313 · Cited by 538
Cascading Effects of Bird Functional Extinction Reduce Pollination and Plant Density
Anderson, S. H., Kelly, D., Ladley, J. J., Molloy, S., & Terry, J. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1199092 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Larson, B. M. H., & Barrett, S. C. H.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 503-520
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998392773
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 19.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/bijl.1999.0372
- The paper
- Larson, B. M. H., & Barrett, S. C. H. (2000). A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1999.0372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.