Cited by 360Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

In search of the language switch: an fMRI study of picture naming in Spanish-English bilinguals

Hernandez, Arturo E., Martinez, Antigona, Kohnert, Kathryn·2000·Brain and Language

Abstract

For many years, researchers investigating the brain bases of bilingualism have concentrated on two basic questions. The first concerns the nature of language representation. That is, are a bilinguals' two languages represented in distinct or overlapping areas of the brain. The second basic question in the neuropsychology of bilingualism concerns the neural correlates of language switching, that is, the areas that are active when bilinguals switch from one language to the other. Performance between single-language and dual-language picture naming was compared in a group of six Spanish-English bilinguals using behavioral measures and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants showed slower reaction times and increased activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the mixed language condition relative to single language condition. There was no evidence that each language was represented in different areas of the brain. Results are consistent with the view that language switching is a part of a general executive attentional system and that languages are represented in overlapping areas of the brain in early bilinguals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/brln.1999.2278

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On tasks requiring picture naming, bilinguals respond more slowly and with lower accuracy than monolinguals.

    “On picture-naming tasks, bilingual participants are slower [25–28] and less accurate [29, 30] than monolinguals.”

    From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [28]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 360

Authors
Hernandez, A. E., Martinez, A., & Kohnert, K.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Venue
Brain and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-07
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
421-431
ISSN
0093-934X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977579018
Cited by
360
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 22
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag013474-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (5-R01-AG13474-02)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC000216, 2-RO1-DC00216-10)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
language switching, bilingualism, picture naming, Spanish-English bilinguals, linguistic representation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, executive attention, reaction time
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Vocabulary, Prefrontal Cortex, Multilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review