Functional heterogeneity of inferior frontal gyrus is shaped by linguistic experience
Abstract
A crosslinguistic, positron emission tomography (PET) study was conducted to determine the influence of linguistic experience on the perception of segmental (consonants and vowels) and suprasegmental (tones) information. Chinese and English subjects (10 per group) were presented binaurally with lists consisting of five Chinese monosyllabic morphemes (speech) or low-pass-filtered versions of the same stimuli (nonspeech). The first and last items were targeted for comparison; the time interval between target tones was filled with irrelevant distractor tones. A speeded-response, selective attention paradigm required subjects to make discrimination judgments of the target items while ignoring intervening distractor tones. PET scans were acquired for five tasks presented twice: one passive listening to pitch (nonspeech) and four active (speech = consonant, vowel, and tone; nonspeech = pitch). Significant regional changes in blood flow were identified from comparisons of group-averaged images of active tasks relative to passive listening. Chinese subjects show increased activity in left premotor cortex, pars opercularis, and pars triangularis across the four tasks. English subjects, on the other hand, show increased activity in left inferior frontal gyrus regions only in the vowel task and in right inferior frontal gyrus regions in the pitch task. Findings suggest that functional circuits engaged in speech perception depend on linguistic experience. All linguistic information signaled by prosodic cues engages left-hemisphere mechanisms. Storage and executive processes of working memory that are implicated in phonological processing are mediated in discrete regions of the left frontal lobe.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Speech and nonspeech sounds activate the left inferior frontal cortex (pars triangularis and pars opercularis) when they need to be segmented and held in auditory working memory.
“Beyond the temporal lobes, speech and nonspeech sounds activated the left inferior frontal cortex (pars triangularis and pars opercularis) when they needed to be segmented and held in auditory working memory (Burton et al., 2000; Pedersen et al., 2000; Hsieh et al., 2001; Poldrack et al., 2001).”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Hsieh et al., 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 196
- Authors
- Hsieh, L., Gandour, J., Wong, D., & Hutchins, G. D.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Hutchins, Gary D.
- Venue
- Brain and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-252
- ISSN
- 0093-934X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107498004
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain and Language (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- inferior frontal gyrus, language experience, speech perception, tone perception, prosodic features, segmental information, Chinese-English comparison, hemispheric lateralization, left hemisphere, working memory, phonological processing, selective attention, premotor cortex, pars opercularis, pars triangularis, blood flow
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Language, Functional Laterality, Linguistics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Phonetics, Speech Discrimination Tests, Speech Perception, Tomography, Emission-Computed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review