Cited by 102Philosophy and Theoretical SciencePsychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceCognitive Computing and Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Software Agent Model of Consciousness

Franklin, Stan, Graesser, Art·1999·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

Baars (1988, 1997) has proposed a psychological theory of consciousness, called global workspace theory. The present study describes a software agent implementation of that theory, called "Conscious" Mattie (CMattie). CMattie operates in a clerical domain from within a UNIX operating system, sending messages and interpreting messages in natural language that organize seminars at a university. CMattie fleshes out global workspace theory with a detailed computational model that integrates contemporary architectures in cognitive science and artificial intelligence. Baars (1997) lists the psychological "facts that any complete theory of consciousness must explain" in his appendix to In the Theater of Consciousness; global workspace theory was designed to explain these "facts." The present article discusses how the design of CMattie accounts for these facts and thereby the extent to which it implements global workspace theory.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ccog.1999.0391

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to other scientific theories of consciousness, many more proposals have been made for the implementation of GWT in artificial systems.

    “Compared to other scientific theories of consciousness, many more proposals have been made for the implementation of GWT in artificial systems (e.g.Franklin & Graesser 1999, Shanahan 2006, Bao et al. 2020).”

    From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Franklin & Graesser 1999

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Baddeley, 1992, Working memory, Science, 255, 556, 10.1126/science.1736359 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ericsson, 1980, Verbal reports as data, Psychological Review, 87, 215, 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215 · DOI
  3. Franklin, 1997, Autonomous agents as embodied AI, Cybernetics and Systems, 28, 499, 10.1080/019697297126029 · DOI
  4. Franklin, 1997, Global workspace agents, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4, 234
  5. Franklin, S, Graesser, A, Olde, B, Song, H, &, Negatu, A. 1996, Virtual Mattie—An intelligent clerical agent. Paper presented at AAAI Fall Shymposium on Embodied AI.
  6. Graesser, 1991, Question answering in the context of stories, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 254, 10.1037/0096-3445.120.3.254 · DOI
  7. Graesser, 1994, Constructing inferences during narrative comprehension, Psychological Review, 101, 371, 10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371 · DOI
  8. Jackson, J. V. 1987, July, Idea for a mind, SIGGART Newsletter,, No. 181 (pp, 23, – 26, ). · DOI
  9. Leung, 1988, Fuzzy concepts in expert systems, Computer, 21, 43, 10.1109/2.14346 · DOI
  10. Maes, 1990, How to do the right thing, Connection Science, 1, 3
  11. Maes, P. 1992, Learning behavior networks from experience, Proceedings of the first european conference on artificial life,, Paris, December 1991, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Maturana, 1975, The organization of the living: A theory of the living organization, International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 7, 313, 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80015-0 · DOI
  13. McCauley, T. L, &, Franklin, S. 1998, An architecture for emotion. Paper presented at AAAI Fall Symposium on Emotional and Intelligent: The Tangled Knot of Cognition.
  14. Ramamurthy, U, Franklin, S, &, Negatu, A. 1998, Learning concepts in software agents. From animals to animats IV, Proceedings of SAB'98, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (pp, 372, – 377, ). · DOI
  15. Zhang, Z, Franklin, S, Olde, B, Wan, Y, &, Graesser, A. 1998a, Natural language sensing for autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Symposium on Intelligence and Systems (pp, 374, – 381, ). · DOI
  16. Zhang, Z, Franklin, S, &, Dasgupta, D. 1998b, Metacognition in software agents using classifer systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI 98, (, 82, – 88, ).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Franklin, S., & Graesser, A.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Franklin, Stan
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-09
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
285-301
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989576180
Cited by
102
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
Keywords
global workspace theory, consciousness, software agents, computational models of consciousness, UNIX operating system, clerical work
MeSH terms
Cognition, Consciousness, Humans, Memory, Problem Solving, Psychological Theory, Software, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review