Cited by 140Higher Education Research StudiesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Self-Regulation Behaviors in Underprepared (Developmental) and Regular Admission College Students

Ley, Kathryn, Young, Dawn B.·1998·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Abstract

Although there is evidence that self-regulated learning processes, such as self-efficacy and goal setting, are significantly related to academic success most studies have not included participants from the one third of the entering college students who must take remedial college courses. The purpose of our research was to examine the differences between the self regulation reported by regular admission students and by underprepared students. We hypothesized that self regulating behaviors could predict developmental, that is underprepared, status or regular admission status among postsecondary students. Self regulation processes in randomly selected developmental and regular admission college students were identified using a structured interview. A discriminant function analysis tested the predictive ability of three measures of self regulating behavior. Developmental and regular admission students differed significantly in their self regulatory strategy deployment. The results suggest that self regulation may be a distinguishing characteristic between some developmental and regular admission students. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ceps.1997.0956

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a compelling amount of research on SRL development during formal education years.

    “There is a compelling amount of research on SRL development during formal education years (Paris and Newman, 1990; Ley and Young, 1998; Núñez et al., 2013).”

    From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Ley and Young, 1998

  • Students often have difficulty in accurately assessing their actual academic abilities and need feedback in order to make more accurate assessments of their performance accomplishments.

    “Students often have difficulty in accurately assessing their actual academic abilities and need feedback in order to make more accurate assessments of their performance accomplishments (Ley & Young, 1998;Slemon & Shafrir, 1997;Young & Ley, 2000, 2001;Zimmerman, 1990).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 140

Authors
Ley, K., & Young, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Grambling State University (US)
  • Bossier Parish Community College (US)
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
42-64
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045795773
Cited by
140
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
student self-regulation, university students, self-regulation strategies, academic self-efficacy, goal setting, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review