The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Account of Sustainability: Failure, Success and a Reconceptualization
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IUCN (1980) · doi:10.2305/iucn.ch.1980.9.en · Cited by 724
Cited by
Deegan, C. (2002) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570210435852 · Cited by 3,829
Gray, R. (2010) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006 · Cited by 1,312
Self-citationMilne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8 · Cited by 1,240
Self-citationSustainability accounting—a brief history and conceptual framework
Lamberton, G. (2005) · Accounting Forum · doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2004.11.001 · Cited by 506
Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach
Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B., & Thomson, I. (2007) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570710748544 · Cited by 417
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bebbington, J., & Gray, R.
- Venue
- Critical Perspectives on Accounting
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 557-587
- ISSN
- 1045-2354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061037178
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Account of Sustainability: Failure, Success and a Reconceptualization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/cpac.2000.0450
- The paper
- Bebbington, J., & Gray, R. (2001). An Account of Sustainability: Failure, Success and a Reconceptualization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2000.0450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
