Cited by 100Mercury impact and mitigation studiesHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityArsenic contamination and mitigation

Mercury exposures in riverside Amazon communities in Para, Brazil

Open access
de Oliveira Santos, Elisabeth C., de Jesus, Iracina Maura, da Silva Brabo, Edilson, Brito Loureiro, Edvaldo C., da Silva Mascarenhas, Artur F., Weirich, Judith, Câmara, Volney de M., Cleary, David·2000·Environmental Research

Abstract

Cross-sectional studies were conducted in three riverside communities in the state of Pará in the Amazon Region of Brazil. Two of these communities, Brasília Legal and São Luís do Tapajós, are located in a watershed exposed to mercury pollution from artisanal gold mining, and the third, Santana do Ituqui, is outside this area. The studies were based upon a community census and included all persons volunteering for participation in each community. All participants were surveyed by questionnaire for health history, occupation, residence, and diet. Clinical evaluations were also done on each subject, along with collection of blood, urine, feces, and hair. Fish samples were collected to represent the most frequently consumed species. Mercury was measured in hair and fish. Although no signs or symptoms of overt mercury intoxication were observed, persons in Brasília Legal and São Luís do Tapajós had higher levels of mercury in hair than residents of Santana de Ituqui, located out of the risk area. Levels of mercury in fish were below Brazilian health guidance limits, but the high rates of fish consumption among these populations raise concerns for the possible effects of chronic exposure, especially among young children and women of childbearing age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/enrs.2000.4088

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Oliveira Santos, E. C., de Jesus, I. M., da Silva Brabo, E., Brito Loureiro, E. C., da Silva Mascarenhas, A. F., Weirich, J., Câmara, V. D. M., & Cleary, D.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Evandro Chagas (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • European Union (BE)
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-10
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
100-107
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138885738
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Keywords
mercury exposure, artisanal gold mining, riverine communities, hair mercury, mercury in fish, fish consumption, chronic mercury exposure, women of reproductive age, Pará
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Animals, Brazil, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environmental Exposure, Female, Fishes, Food Contamination, Hair, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Water Pollution, Chemical, Water Supply, Mercury Compounds, Age Distribution, Seafood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review