Cited by 113Angiogenesis and VEGF in CancerCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Functional Characterization of the Spontaneously Transformed Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell Line ECV304: Use in anin VitroModel of Angiogenesis

Hughes, Siân E.·1996·Experimental Cell Research

Abstract

To gain insight into the role of the endothelial cell during the pathophysiology of the angiogenic response, investigators have isolated micro- and macrovascular endothelial cells from a wide range of both animal and human vessels, including the umbilical vein. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) isolated from umbilical cords remain a readily available and popular source of endothelial cell. However, the isolation and culture of these cells have several disadvantages, including the risk of infection, exogenous growth factor requirement, and low proliferative capacity. The heterogeneity of endothelial cells from different vascular beds as well as the heterogeneity between HUVEC isolates from different cords can make the critical interpretation of results difficult. ECV304 is a unique spontaneously transformed human umbilical vein endothelial cell line. In this report, the novel use of ECV304 cells as an alternative to HUVECs in an in vitro model of angiogenesis using the reconstituted basement membrane extract (Matrigel) was investigated. ECV304 cells were characterized immunohistochemically and their angiogenic behavior on Matrigel was analyzed functionally by phase-contrast, electron, and time-lapse video microscopy. ECV304 cells had several practical advantages over HUVEC culture and in contrast to HUVECs, ECV304 cells exhibited an enhanced and highly reproducible capacity for in vitro angiogenesis. However, several differentiated functions were lost or reduced…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/excr.1996.0168

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The HaCaT, HUVEC, SV-HUC-1, and hEM15A cell lines were totally free from cross-contamination.

    “The HaCaT [34], HUVEC [35], SV-HUC-1[36], and hEM15A cell lines established from immortalized human skin cutis cells, umbilical cords, ureteral epithelium and endometrial stromal cells were totally free from cross-contamination.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, S. E.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hughes, Siân E.
Venue
Experimental Cell Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-05
Volume
225
Issue
1
Pages
171-185
ISSN
0014-4827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153920513
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
human umbilical vein endothelial cells, angiogenesis, in vitro angiogenesis model, Matrigel, endothelial heterogeneity, cytokeratin expression, endothelial differentiation, endothelial cell culture
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Surface, Cell Line, Transformed, Endothelium, Vascular, Humans, Models, Biological, Time Factors, Umbilical Veins, Neovascularization, Physiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review