Differential spine loss and regrowth of striatal neurons following multiple forms of deafferentation: a Golgi study
Abstract
Golgi-Cox method and morphometric analyses were used to study the plasticity of striatal medium spiny I neurons in 6-month-old C57BL/6N mice after unilateral or bilateral lesion of the cerebral cortex or combined lesions of the ipsilateral cerebral cortex and intralaminar thalamus. In adult mouse, unilateral lesions of the cerebral cortex did not result in a net gain or loss of linear dendritic length in a randomly selected population of striatal medium spiny I neurons. In addition, there was a well-defined time course of striatal spine loss and replacement occurring after a unilateral cortical lesion. By day 3 postlesion the average 20-microm dendritic segment had lost 30% of the unlesioned control spine value, reached its nadir, lost 45.5%, at 10 days postlesion, and recovered to 80% of unlesioned control levels by 20 days postlesion. The recovery of spines was blocked by a secondary lesion on the contralateral cortex but not on the ipsilateral intralaminar thalamus. These data suggest that striatal medium spiny I neurons of adult mice have a remarkable capacity for plasticity and reactive synaptogenesis following a decortication. The recovery of spine density is primarily induced by axonal sprouting of survival homologous afferent fibers from the contralateral cortex.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spine loss occurs predominantly on DA-D2R-containing medium spiny neurons of the indirect pathway, reflecting dysfunction in neurotransmission in this circuitry.
“Spine loss occurs predominantly on DA-D2R-containing MSNs of the indirect pathway, reflecting the dysfunction in neurotransmission in this circuitry 92, 93.”
From Exercise-enhanced neuroplasticity targeting motor and cognitive circuitry in Parkinson's disease (2013) · cites this paper as [93]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Cheng, H.-W., Rafols, J. A., Goshgarian, H. G., Anavi, Y., Tong, J., & McNeill, T. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Heng-Wei
- Venue
- Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-298
- ISSN
- 0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007889841
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ns014705-11)
- National Institute on Aging (AG-09793, P01AG009793)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM0816)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 14705)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- striatal medium spiny neurons, dendritic spine loss, deafferentation, cortical lesions, intralaminar thalamus, axonal sprouting, reactive synaptogenesis, neuroplasticity, dendritic morphology, decortication
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Dendrites, Denervation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Regeneration, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Synapses, Thalamus, Cell Size, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review