The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Exposure to Water Aerosol or Air by Nose-Only or Whole-Body Inhalation Procedures for CD-1 Mice in Developmental Toxicity Studies
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate the effects of nose-only restraint versus whole-body exposure procedures in the absence of test chemical, and to determine the appropriate control environment (water aerosol or air) for subsequent developmental toxicity studies of test materials administered as aerosols. Timed-pregnant CD-1 mice, 30/group, were exposed to high concentrations of water aerosol or to air by whole-body or nose-only inhalation procedures on Gestational Days (GD) 6 through 15 for 6 hr per day. The group exposed to air by whole-body procedures was designated as the control group. Clinical observations and maternal body weights were recorded throughout gestation. At scheduled necropsy on GD 18, maternal animals were evaluated for body weight, gravid uterine weight, liver weight, number of ovarian corpora lutea, and status of uterine implantation sites. Fetuses were counted, weighed, and sexed and were examined for external, visceral (including craniofacial), and skeletal alterations. Indices of maternal toxicity were affected in both nose-only groups. Maternal body weights were reduced during and after the exposure period; maternal weight gain was reduced during the exposure period. Clinical signs observed, from animals struggling during restraint, were resolved by GD 18. At sacrifice on GD 18, maternal body weights and maternal gestational weight gains (both corrected for gravid uterine weights) and absolute liver weights were reduced in both nose-only groups. Fo…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Both inhalation methods have pitfalls. In one hand, a precise analysis of the aerosol can be made following exposure in chamber, but the amount of inhaled fibers is less precise (hair deposition, etc.); on the other hand, animals housed in a container represent a different situation from the human working activities, and some studies suggest that animals can be stressed in these conditions [50-55]”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
Cited by
Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
Inhalation Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) and Carbon Nanofibers (CNF): Methodology and Dosimetry
Oberdörster, G., Castranova, V., Asgharian, B., & Sayre, P. (2015) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2015.1051611 · Cited by 150
Adaptation to Stress Induced by Restraining Rats and Mice in Nose-Only Inhalation Holders
Narciso, S. P., Nadziejko, E., Chen, L. C., Gordon, T., & Nadziejko, C. (2003) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370390228592 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Tyl, R.
- Venue
- Fundamental and Applied Toxicology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-260
- ISSN
- 0272-0590
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Exposure to Water Aerosol or Air by Nose-Only or Whole-Body Inhalation Procedures for CD-1 Mice in Developmental Toxicity Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/faat.1994.1103
- The paper
- Tyl, R. (1994). Evaluation of Exposure to Water Aerosol or Air by Nose-Only or Whole-Body Inhalation Procedures for CD-1 Mice in Developmental Toxicity Studies. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1006/faat.1994.1103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.