Cited by 186Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersRNA Research and Splicing

HumanMinibrainHomologue (MNBH/DYRK1): Characterization, Alternative Splicing, Differential Tissue Expression, and Overexpression in Down Syndrome

Guimera, Jordi, Casas, Caty, Estivill, Xavier, Pritchard, Melanie·1999·Genomics

Abstract

The human homologue (MNBH/DYRK1) of the Drosophila minibrain gene maps to human chromosome 21 within the Down syndrome (DS) critical region and is within the region minimally deleted in chromosome 21-linked microcephaly. As a first step in gaining insight into the role that MNBH may have in human neurogenesis, and as a lead-up to the development of mouse models for MNBH overexpression, we have characterized the gene at the molecular level. We describe here the MNBH full-length transcript, alternative splicing, expression profile, and genomic organization. The full-length cDNA of MNBH is 5. 2 kb and is composed of 17 exons spanning 150 kb, between markers D21S335 and D21S337. Transcripts MNBHa and MNBHb arise from the use of different first exons in the 5'-UTR and are differentially expressed. MNBHa is expressed ubiquitiously in a broad spectrum of tissues and is apparently under the control of a CpG island. MNBHb is expressed only in heart and skeletal muscle and is apparently under the control of a TATA-like box. Four alternative splicing events affecting the C-terminus of the protein yield at least four isoforms of MNBH (MNBH-iso1, MNBH-iso2, MNBH-iso3, and MNBH-iso4). A PEST sequence, potentially involved in the rapid degradation of the protein, is present in all the isoforms. A histidine repeat and a serine/threonine domain are present only in the largest form of the protein (MNBH-iso1). MNBH was overexpressed 1.5-fold in DS brains and Dyrk1 about 2.1-fold in the brains o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/geno.1999.5775

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 186

Authors
Guimera, J., Casas, C., Estivill, X., & Pritchard, M.
Affiliations
Duran i Reynals Hospital (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Estivill, Xavier
  • Pritchard, Melanie
Venue
Genomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-05
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
407-418
ISSN
0888-7543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117065031
Cited by
186
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
Down syndrome, chromosome 21, alternative splicing, protein isoforms, tissue expression, CpG islands, PEST sequence, Ts65Dn mouse model, neurogenesis, microcephaly, gene overexpression, mouse models of Down syndrome
MeSH terms
Dyrk Kinases, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Down Syndrome, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Kinases, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Gene Expression, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Alternative Splicing, Protein Structure, Secondary, DNA, Complementary, 3' Untranslated Regions, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review