Making the Terrestrial Planets: N-Body Integrations of Planetary Embryos in Three Dimensions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mars is smaller than predicted by standard formation models.
“Mars formed very rapidly compared to Earth (Dauphas & Pourmand 2011) and is smaller than predicted by standard formation models (Chambers & Wetherill 1998).”
From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Chambers & Wetherill 1998
Cites
Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity
Kozai, Y. (1962) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/108790 · Cited by 2,588 · see citing works
Habitable Zones around Main Sequence Stars
Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, R. T. (1993) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1010 · Cited by 2,501 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emergence of two types of terrestrial planet on solidification of magma ocean
Hamano, K., Abe, Y., & Genda, H. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12163 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Wordsworth, R. D. (2016) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012355 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
“Mars formed very rapidly compared to Earth (Dauphas & Pourmand 2011) and is smaller than predicted by standard formation models (Chambers & Wetherill 1998).”
BackgroundTHE Hf-W ISOTOPIC SYSTEM AND THE ORIGIN OF THE EARTH AND MOON
Jacobsen, S. B. (2005) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122614 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
The naked planet Earth: Most essential pre-requisite for the origin and evolution of life
Maruyama, S., Ikoma, M., Genda, H., Hirose, K., Yokoyama, T., & Santosh, M. (2013) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2012.11.001 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chambers, J. E., & Wetherill, G. W.
- Affiliations
- Armagh Observatory & Planetarium (GB)
- Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
- ORCID
- Chambers, J.E.
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 304-327
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158129300
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 12.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Icarus (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- terrestrial planet formation, planetary embryos, N-body simulations, secular resonances, orbital eccentricity, orbital inclination, accretion rate, orbital scattering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
