The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurements and Relationships of Diagenetic Alteration of Bone from Three Archaeological Sites
Open accessAbstract
Four diagenetic parameters have been chosen to represent the state of diagenesis of bone buried on archaeological sites. They are: histological preservation, protein content, crystallinity, and porosity. How these parameters are measured is described and results from populations of bones from three different sites are presented. The results show the extent and variation in the degree of change, both within a site and between sites. In particular the correlations between diagenetic parameters are examined, which give clues about the processes which cause alteration. The value of porosity determinations (both at the intercrystalline level, and at coarser levels) in revealing the degree of diagenetic change in bone, and in underlying the dynamics of the interaction between buried bone and the surrounding water is stressed. The data also indicate (but are too restricted to prove) the following: Microbiological attack is generally complete within less than 500 years; Substantial levels of protein may remain in bone after maximal micromorphological alteration; Loss of protein appears to be independent of other diagenetic change; The correlated lose of microporosity with increase of crystallinity suggests these changes may arise from the dissolution, perhaps with subsequent recrystallization, of the smallest hydroxyapatite crystallites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Koch, P. L., Tuross, N., & Fogel, M. L. (1997) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1006/jasc.1996.0126 · Cited by 957
Bone diagenesis: an overview of processes
Hedges, R. E. M. (2002) · Archaeometry · doi:10.1111/1475-4754.00064 · Cited by 598
Self-citationStable Isotope Compositions of Biological Apatite
Kohn, M. J., & Cerling, T. E. (2002) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/rmg.2002.48.12 · Cited by 477
Patterns of Diagenesis in Bone I: The Effects of Site Environments
Nielsen-Marsh, C. M., & Hedges, R. E. M. (2000) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0537 · Cited by 443
Self-citationCharacterisation of microbial attack on archaeological bone
Jans, M. M. E., Nielsen-Marsh, C. M., Smith, C. I., Collins, M. J., & Kars, H. (2004) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2003.07.007 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedges, R. E. M., Millard, A. R., & Pike, A. W. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-209
- ISSN
- 0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004110709
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 59.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurements and Relationships of Diagenetic Alteration of Bone from Three Archaeological Sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jasc.1995.0022
- The paper
- Hedges, R. E. M., Millard, A. R., & Pike, A. W. G. (1995). Measurements and Relationships of Diagenetic Alteration of Bone from Three Archaeological Sites. Journal of Archaeological Science. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1995.0022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.