The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Central Place Models of Acorn and Mussel Processing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Central place foraging models assume that hunter-gatherers aim to maximize their foraging efforts, and such models provide optimal solutions to efforts to look for, acquire, and transport resources.
“The basic premise is that hunter-gatherers aim to maximize their foraging efforts, and such models provide optimal solutions to efforts to look for, acquire, and transport resources.”
From Modeling Foraging Ranges and Spatial Organization of Late Pleistocene Hunter gatherers in the Southern Levant - A Least-Cost GIS Approach (2016) · cites this paper as Bettinger et al., 1997
Citations
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
Terrain coefficients for energy cost prediction.
Soule, R. G., & Goldman, R. F. (1972) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1972.32.5.706 · Cited by 202
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene
Verhagen, P., & Whitley, T. G. (2012) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-011-9102-7 · Cited by 190
Byrd, B. F., Garrard, A. N., & Brandy, P. (2016) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2015.07.048 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Bettinger, R. L., Malhi, R., & McCarthy, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 887-899
- ISSN
- 0305-4403
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review