Cited by 181Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and Historyearthquake and tectonic studiesMaritime and Coastal Archaeology

Poseidon's Horses: Plate Tectonics and Earthquake Storms in the Late Bronze Age Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean

Open access
Nur, Amos, Cline, Eric H.·2000·Journal of Archaeological Science

Abstract

In light of the accumulated evidence now published, the oft-denigrated suggestion that major earthquakes took place in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean areas during the late 13th and early 12th centuries bc must be reconsidered. A new study of earthquakes occurring in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean region during the 20th century, utilizing data recorded since the invention of seismic tracking devices, shows that this area is criss-crossed with major fault lines and that numerous temblors of magnitude 6·5 (enough to destroy modern buildings, let alone those of antiquity) occur frequently. It can be demonstrated that such major earthquakes often occur in groups, known as “sequences” or “storms”, in which one large quake is followed days, months, or even years later by others elsewhere on the now-weakened fault line. When a map of the areas in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean region affected (i.e. shaken) by 20th centuryad earthquakes of magnitude 6·5 and greater and with an intensity of VII or greater is overlaid on Robert Drews' map of sites destroyed in these same regions during the so-called “Catastrophe” near the end of the Late Bronze Age, it is readily apparent that virtually all of these LBA sites lie within the affected (“high-shaking”) areas. While the evidence is not conclusive, based on these new data we would suggest that an “earthquake storm” may have occurred in the Late Bronze Age Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean during the years 1225–1175bc . This…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jasc.1999.0431

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The earthquake storm proposed by Nur and Cline may have been a significant contributor to site destructions at the LB/IA interface.

    “Amos Nur and Eric H . Cline (2000) have amassed evidence to suggest that an “earthquake storm,” a series of related earthquakes that spread across southern Greece, western Anatolia, and coastal northern Syria and the southern Levant over a fifty-year period or so at the LB/IA interface, may have been a significant contributor to the site destructions observed”

    From Shishak and Shoshenq: A Disambiguation (2021) · cites this paper as Nur and Eric H . Cline (2000)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nur, A., & Cline, E. H.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
43-63
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989310243
Cited by
181
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
25.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Keywords
Late Bronze Age Aegean, Eastern Mediterranean, earthquake sequence, seismicity, fault lines, site destruction, Bronze Age collapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review