The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Limits of Nonapproximability of Lattice Problems
Open accessAbstract
We show simple constant-round interactive proof systems for problems capturing the approximability, to within a factor of n , of optimization problems in integer lattices, specifically, the closest vector problem (CVP) and the shortest vector problem (SVP). These interactive proofs are for the coNP direction; that is, we give an interactive protocol showing that a vector is far from the lattice (for CVP) and an interactive protocol showing that the shortest-lattice-vector is long (for SVP). Furthermore, these interactive proof systems are honest-verifier perfect zero-knowledge. We conclude that approximating CVP (resp., SVP) within a factor of n is in N P ∩co A M . Thus, it seems unlikely that approximating these problems to within a n factor is NP-hard. Previously, for the CVP (resp., SVP) problem, Lagarias et al. (1990, Combinatorica 10 , 333–348), Håstad (1988, Combinatorica 8 , 75–81), and Banaszczyk (1993, Math. Annal. 296 , 625–635) showed that the gap problem corresponding to approximating CVP (resp., SVP) within n is in N P ∩co N P . On the other hand, Arora et al. (1997, J. Comput. System Sci. 54 , 317–331) showed that the gap problem corresponding to approximating CVP within 2 log 0.999 n is quasi-NP-hard.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Worst‐Case to Average‐Case Reductions Based on Gaussian Measures
Micciancio, D., & Regev, O. (2007) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539705447360 · Cited by 907
Micciancio, D., & Regev, O. (2009) · Post-Quantum Cryptography · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7_5 · Cited by 615
A sieve algorithm for the shortest lattice vector problem
Ajtai, M., Kumar, R., & Sivakumar, D. (2001) · Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/380752.380857 · Cited by 558
Regev, O. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11818175_8 · Cited by 485
Adiabatic quantum state generation and statistical zero knowledge
Aharonov, D., & Ta-Shma, A. (2003) · Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/780542.780546 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldreich, O., & Goldwasser, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer and System Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 540-563
- ISSN
- 0022-0000 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W271219125
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Limits of Nonapproximability of Lattice Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jcss.1999.1686
- The paper
- Goldreich, O., & Goldwasser, S. (2000). On the Limits of Nonapproximability of Lattice Problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1999.1686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.