Cited by 394Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Language Deficits in Dyslexic Children: Speech Perception, Phonology, and Morphology

Joanisse, Marc F., Manis, Franklin R., Keating, Patricia, Seidenberg, Mark S.·2000·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between dyslexia and three aspects of language: speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Reading and language tasks were administered to dyslexics aged 8-9 years and to two normal reader groups (age-matched and reading-level matched). Three dyslexic groups were identified: phonological dyslexics (PD), developmentally language impaired (LI), and globally delayed (delay-type dyslexics). The LI and PD groups exhibited similar patterns of reading impairment, attributed to low phonological skills. However, only the LI group showed clear speech perception deficits, suggesting that such deficits affect only a subset of dyslexics. Results also indicated phonological impairments in children whose speech perception was normal. Both the LI and the PD groups showed inflectional morphology difficulties, with the impairment being more severe in the LI group. The delay group's reading and language skills closely matched those of younger normal readers, suggesting these children had a general delay in reading and language skills, rather than a specific phonological impairment. The results are discussed in terms of models of word recognition and dyslexia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jecp.1999.2553

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joanisse, M. F., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
30-60
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965451234
Cited by
394
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
24.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (KO2-01188)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH 04756)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD029891, HD 29891)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
dyslexia, phonological dyslexia, speech perception deficits, phonological disorders, inflectional morphology, specific language impairment, reading disorders, word recognition models, language deficits, children
MeSH terms
Awareness, Child, Dyslexia, Humans, Language Disorders, Longitudinal Studies, Phonetics, Severity of Illness Index, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review