Cited by 128Visual perception and processing mechanismsAesthetic Perception and AnalysisLandscape and Cultural Studies

VISUAL THRESHOLDS FOR DETECTION, RECOGNITION AND VISUAL IMPACT IN LANDSCAPE SETTINGS

SHANG, HAIDONG, BISHOP, I.D.·2000·Journal of Environmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jevp.1999.0153

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real-world settings consist of a much wider range of physical properties of viewers and environments, including size, contrast, colour, shape, texture, pattern, complexity, static/dynamic position, atmospheric conditions, distance, angle of observation, etc.

    “Real-world settings consist of the much wider range of psychical properties of viewers and environments.These include size, contrast, colour, shape, texture, pattern, and complexity of the viewed elements, their static or dynamic position, atmospheric conditions, distance, angle of observation, etc. (Wang et al. 2014;Gret-Regamy et al. 2007;Shang and Bishop 2000).”

    From A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location (2018) · cites this paper as Shang and Bishop 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SHANG, H., & BISHOP, I. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
125-140
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043974083
Cited by
128
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Landscape and Cultural Studies
Keywords
visual threshold, visual detection, visual recognition, visual impact, landscape perception, contrast, object size, landscape types, visual magnitude, logistic model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review