Cited by 45Fish biology, ecology, and behaviorFish Ecology and Management StudiesFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Standing crop and distribution of fish in drifting and attached floating meadow within an Upper Amazonian varzea lake

Henderson, P. A., Hamilton, H. F.·1995·Journal of Fish Biology

Abstract

The standing crop and distribution of fish within the floating meadow habitat of Lago Mamirauá, an upper Amazonian floodplain lake, were studied during December 1993 when the water was rising and had just begun to enter the forest. The ichthyofauna was dominated by six groups, the Anostomidae, Gymnotiformes, Erythrinidae, Serrasalmidae, Synbranchidae and Cichlidae. For anchored meadow, total wet weight was estimated as 312 kg ha ‐1 and total number as 90 400 individuals ha‐1. This biomass estimate was probably below the annual maximum because some fish had already dispersed into the forest, but, the number of individuals was close to the annual maximum because of the recent arrival of juvenile Serrasalmidae and Cichlidae. For drifting islands of meadow fish biomass and density were estimated as 192kg ha‐1 and 12 700 individuals ha‐1 respectively. The Synbranchidae, Gymnotiformes and Erythrinidae avoided drifting meadow. In comparison, the Cichlidae and Anostomidae, while favouring marginal, anchored meadow, were frequently dispersed by drifting islands. The Siluriformes were unique in favouring drifting over anchored meadow. For this group the observed down‐stream drift may be a seasonal migration to the main river channels. Juvenile fish avoided drifting islands, presumably to avoid being flushed from the lakes. Their abundance was lowest at the mouth of the lake. The generally abundant Serrasalmus spp. juveniles were absent from meadow at the mouth of the lake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1995.tb01894.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Henderson and Hamilton (1995) found certain species of dwarf cichlids (Apistogramma spp.) to be strongly associated with floating meadows, and this genus was previously identified as an indicator of forested habitat.

    “Henderson and Hamilton (1995) found certain species of dwarf cichlids (Apistogramma spp.) to be strongly associated with floating meadows, and this genus was previously identified as an indicator of forested habitat (Martins et al., 2021).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henderson, P. A., & Hamilton, H. F.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Journal of Fish Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-08
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
266-276
ISSN
  • 0022-1112 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8649
OpenAlex
W2091887787
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Fish Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
várzea lakes, floodplain fish, fish distribution, fish biomass, ichthyofauna, Serrasalmidae, cichlid fish, Anostomidae, Gymnotiformes, Erythrinidae, Synbranchidae, seasonal migration, Upper Amazon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review