Standing crop and distribution of fish in drifting and attached floating meadow within an Upper Amazonian varzea lake
Abstract
The standing crop and distribution of fish within the floating meadow habitat of Lago Mamirauá, an upper Amazonian floodplain lake, were studied during December 1993 when the water was rising and had just begun to enter the forest. The ichthyofauna was dominated by six groups, the Anostomidae, Gymnotiformes, Erythrinidae, Serrasalmidae, Synbranchidae and Cichlidae. For anchored meadow, total wet weight was estimated as 312 kg ha ‐1 and total number as 90 400 individuals ha‐1. This biomass estimate was probably below the annual maximum because some fish had already dispersed into the forest, but, the number of individuals was close to the annual maximum because of the recent arrival of juvenile Serrasalmidae and Cichlidae. For drifting islands of meadow fish biomass and density were estimated as 192kg ha‐1 and 12 700 individuals ha‐1 respectively. The Synbranchidae, Gymnotiformes and Erythrinidae avoided drifting meadow. In comparison, the Cichlidae and Anostomidae, while favouring marginal, anchored meadow, were frequently dispersed by drifting islands. The Siluriformes were unique in favouring drifting over anchored meadow. For this group the observed down‐stream drift may be a seasonal migration to the main river channels. Juvenile fish avoided drifting islands, presumably to avoid being flushed from the lakes. Their abundance was lowest at the mouth of the lake. The generally abundant Serrasalmus spp. juveniles were absent from meadow at the mouth of the lake.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Henderson and Hamilton (1995) found certain species of dwarf cichlids (Apistogramma spp.) to be strongly associated with floating meadows, and this genus was previously identified as an indicator of forested habitat.
“Henderson and Hamilton (1995) found certain species of dwarf cichlids (Apistogramma spp.) to be strongly associated with floating meadows, and this genus was previously identified as an indicator of forested habitat (Martins et al., 2021).”
From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Henderson and Hamilton (1995)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grinstead, S., Arantes, C. C., Winemiller, K. O., Kelso‐Winemiller, L. C., de Oliveira, J. A., Petrere, M., & Freitas, C. E. C. (2025) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.70110
- Authors
- Henderson, P. A., & Hamilton, H. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- ORCID
- Henderson, P. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Fish Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 266-276
- ISSN
- 0022-1112 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8649
- OpenAlex
- W2091887787
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Fish Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- várzea lakes, floodplain fish, fish distribution, fish biomass, ichthyofauna, Serrasalmidae, cichlid fish, Anostomidae, Gymnotiformes, Erythrinidae, Synbranchidae, seasonal migration, Upper Amazon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review