Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cortisol and glucose responses after acute stress by net handling in the sparid red porgy previously subjected to crowding stress

Open access
Rotllant, J·1997·Journal of Fish Biology

Abstract

In red porgy Pagrus pagrus subjected to 3 weeks of chronic stress by crowding, plasma cortisol remained significantly higher in crowded fish compared to controls. There was no significant effect of crowding on plasma glucose levels. When the crowded fish were subjected to an acute handling the plasma cortisol response was similar to that of the uncrowded fish. No significant differences were found between the groups. The changes in plasma glucose following acute handling were also similar in both crowded and uncrowded fish.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jfbi.1997.0405

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Rotllant, J.
Venue
Journal of Fish Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-07
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
21-28
ISSN
0022-1112 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081961134
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortisol and glucose responses after acute stress by net handling in the sparid red porgy previously subjected to crowding stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jfbi.1997.0405
The paper
Rotllant, J. (1997). Cortisol and glucose responses after acute stress by net handling in the sparid red porgy previously subjected to crowding stress. Journal of Fish Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.1997.0405

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.