Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 805

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals

Open access
DeWoody, J·2000·Journal of Fish Biology

Abstract

From a total of 524 microsatellite loci considered in nearly 40 000 individuals of 78 species, freshwater fish displayed levels of population genetic variation (mean heterozygosity, h=0·46, and mean numbers of alleles per locus, a=7·5) roughly similar to those of non-piscine animals (h=0·58 and a=7·1). In contrast, local population samples of marine fish displayed on average significantly higher heterozygosities (h=0·79) and nearly three times the number of alleles per locus (a=20·6). Anadromous fish were intermediate to marine and freshwater fish (h=0·68 and a=11·3). Results parallel earlier comparative summaries of allozyme variation in marine, anadromous, and freshwater fishes and probably are attributable in part to differences in evolutionarily effective population sizes typifying species inhabiting these realms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jfbi.1999.1210

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 805

Metadata

Authors
DeWoody, J.
Venue
Journal of Fish Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
461-473
ISSN
0022-1112 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981552924
Cited by
805
References
0
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jfbi.1999.1210
The paper
DeWoody, J. (2000). Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals. Journal of Fish Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.1999.1210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.