Cited by 585Protein Structure and DynamicsBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

The fibronectin type III domain as a scaffold for novel binding proteins

Open access
Koide, Akiko, Bailey, Charles W, Huang, Xiaolin, Koide, Shohei·1998·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

The fibronectin type III domain (FN3) is a small autonomous folding unit which occurs in many animal proteins involving in ligand binding. The beta-sandwich structure of FN3 closely resembles that of immunoglobulin domains. We have prepared a phage display library of FN3 in which residues in two surface loops were randomized. We have selected mutant FN3s which bind to a test ligand, ubiquitin, with significant affinities, while the wild-type FN3 shows no measurable affinity. A dominant clone was expressed as a soluble protein and its properties were investigated in detail. Heteronuclear NMR characterization revealed that the selected mutant protein retains the global fold of FN3. It also has a modest conformational stability despite mutations at 12 out of 94 residues. These results clearly show the potential of FN3 as a scaffold for engineering novel binding proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2238

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Monomeric proteins based on the synthetic protein (FN3) skeleton are similar in function to antibodies and can be used in combination with the corresponding target; they have smaller molecular weight and clearer structure compared to traditional antibodies, and are more stable in oxidation/reduction conditions, making them a new type of ideal inhibitor.

    “Monomeric proteins, based on the synthetic protein (FN3) skeleton, are similar in function to antibodies and can be used in combination with the corresponding target. These proteins have a smaller molecular weight and clearer structure compared to traditional antibodies. Moreover, they are more stable in oxidation/reduction conditions, making them a new type of ideal inhibitor.330,331”
  • POI-targeting polypeptides can either be single chain antibodies (e.g. nanobodies) or a variety of synthetic polypeptide scaffolds that bind POIs such as monobodies, DARPINs, affimers, or Affibodies.

    “These POI-targeting polypeptides can either be single chain antibodies (e.g. variable domains from camelid or shark-derived heavy chain only antibodies, nanobodies), or a variety of synthetic polypeptide scaffolds that bind POIs such as fibronectin type III domain-based monobodies [110, 111], designed ankyrin repeats (DARPINs) [112, 113], cystatin-derived affimers [114] or Affibodies derived from”

    From Advances in targeted degradation of endogenous proteins (2019) · cites this paper as [110]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 585

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kunkel, T. A. (1985). Rapid and ef®cient site-speci®c mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 82, 488± 492.
  2. Rosenblum, J. S. & Barbas, C. F. I. (1995). Synthetic anti- bodies. In Antibody Engineering (Borrenbaeck, C. A. K., ed.), pp. 89 ± 116, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  3. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecu- lar Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edit., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Har- bor, NY.

Authors
Koide, A., Bailey, C. W., Huang, X., & Koide, S.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Koide, Shohei
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
284
Issue
4
Pages
1141-1151
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024298562
Cited by
585
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 23
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29gm055042-05)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM55042)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
fibronectin type III domain, protein scaffolds, phage display, ubiquitin binding, beta-sandwich structure, immunoglobulin-like domains, conformational stability, ligand binding
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Carrier Proteins, DNA, Recombinant, Fibronectins, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Protein Conformation, Recombinant Proteins, Protein Engineering, Mutagenesis, Bacteriophage M13, Protein Folding, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review