The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 1.0 Å crystal structure of Ca2+-bound calmodulin: an analysis of disorder and implications for functionally relevant plasticity
Open accessAbstract
Calmodulin (CaM) is a highly conserved 17 kDa eukaryotic protein that can bind specifically to over 100 protein targets in response to a Ca(2+) signal. Ca(2+)-CaM requires a considerable degree of structural plasticity to accomplish this physiological role; however, the nature and extent of this plasticity remain poorly characterized. Here, we present the 1.0 A crystal structure of Paramecium tetraurelia Ca(2+)-CaM, including 36 discretely disordered residues and a fifth Ca(2+) that mediates a crystal contact. The 36 discretely disordered residues are located primarily in the central helix and the two hydrophobic binding pockets, and reveal correlated side-chain disorder that may assist target-specific deformation of the binding pockets. Evidence of domain displacements and discrete backbone disorder is provided by translation-libration-screw (TLS) analysis and multiconformer models of protein disorder, respectively. In total, the evidence for disorder at every accessible length-scale in Ca(2+)-CaM suggests that the protein occupies a large number of hierarchically arranged conformational substates in the crystalline environment and may sample a quasi-continuous spectrum of conformations in solution. Therefore, we propose that the functionally distinct forms of CaM are less structurally distinct than previously believed, and that the different activities of CaM in response to Ca(2+) may result primarily from Ca(2+)-mediated alterations in the dynamics of the protein.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures
Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., & Thornton, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889892009944 · Cited by 24,581
From Levinthal to pathways to funnels
Dill, K. A., & Chan, H. S. (1997) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0197-10 · Cited by 2,293
Cited by
Putnam, C. D., Hammel, M., Hura, G. L., & Tainer, J. A. (2007) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583507004635 · Cited by 1,184
Rhodopsin: Insights from Recent Structural Studies
Sakmar, T. P., Menon, S. T., Marin, E. P., & Awad, E. S. (2002) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.31.082901.134348 · Cited by 240
Classical-quantum interfaces in living neural tissue supporting conscious functions
(2020) · Advances in Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1016/bs.aiq.2020.08.002 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, M. A., & Brunger, A. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1237-1256
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992062503
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.