The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.4.327 · Cited by 7,414
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 · Cited by 5,933
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
Tversky, A. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0032955 · Cited by 3,365
Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.136 · Cited by 3,247
Context theory of classification learning
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 · Cited by 3,061
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674866270 · Cited by 2,653
Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.39 · Cited by 2,207
Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.
Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.371 · Cited by 1,624
The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(89)90077-5 · Cited by 1,454
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning
Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, B. (2005) · Cited by 2,133
Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.1.45 · Cited by 1,825
Self-citationDistributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping.
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.3.427 · Cited by 951
MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity‐Based Retrieval
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1902_1 · Cited by 753
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- ORCID
- Gentner, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 517-535
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079783775
- Semantic Scholar
- 71396e813fcb793a16f284fd0d0b7866dd071bb4
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- similarity judgments, structural alignment, conceptual structure, word pair similarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
