The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment
Open accessAbstract
Many studies have shown that seabirds are sensitive to changes in food supply, and therefore have potential as monitors of fish stocks. For most seabird species breeding parameters suitable for biomonitoring have yet to be measured over a wide range of prey densities. However, it is clear that responses vary among species and care must be taken when interpreting seabird data as a proxy for fish abundance. For many years seabirds have also been used as monitors of pollution, especially oil pollution. Beached bird surveys provide important evidence of geographical and temporal patterns, and, for example, show consistent declines in oil release into the southern North Sea over the last 15 years. Analysis of oil on birds can now permit fingerprinting of sources, allowing prosecution of polluters. As predators high in marine food webs, seabirds also have potential as monitors of pollutants that accumulate at trophic levels. Recent work on mercury in seabirds has permitted an analysis of spatial patterns and of the rates of increase in mercury contamination of ecosystems over the last 150 years, since mercury concentrations in feathers of museum specimens can be used to assess contamination in the birds when they were alive. Surprisingly, pelagic seabirds show higher increases than most coastal ones, and increases have been greatest in seabirds feeding on mesopelagic prey. This seems to relate to patterns of methylation of mercury in low-oxygen, deeper water. Accurate measurement of long-term trends in mercury contamination depend on the assumption that seabird diet composition has not changed. This can be assessed by analysis of stable isotopes of N and C from the same feathers used for mercury measurement, a technique that also permits the monitoring of trophic status over time or between regions. While high mercury contamination of seabirds in the southern North Sea is unsurprising, we cannot yet explain certain unexpected results, such as high levels in seabirds from north Iceland compared with those from south Iceland or Scotland.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Effects of Fishing on Marine Ecosystems
Jennings, S., & Kaiser, M. J. (1998) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)60212-6 · Cited by 1,502
Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in the study of avian and mammalian trophic ecology
Kelly, J. F. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z99-165 · Cited by 1,378
Ecosystem Services Provided by Birds
Whelan, C. J., Wenny, D. G., & Marquis, R. J. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1439.003 · Cited by 988
Global Seabird Response to Forage Fish Depletion—One-Third for the Birds
Cury, P. M., Boyd, I. L., Bonhommeau, S., Anker-Nilssen, T., Crawford, R. J. M., Furness, R. W., Mills, J. A., Murphy, E. J., Österblom, H., Paleczny, M., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1212928 · Cited by 696
Self-citationDiet studies of seabirds: a review and recommendations
Barrett, R. T., Camphuysen, K. (. J. )., Anker-Nilssen, T., Chardine, J. W., Furness, R. W., Garthe, S., Hüppop, O., Leopold, M. F., Montevecchi, W. A., & Veit, R. R. (2007) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsm152 · Cited by 517
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Furness, R.
- Venue
- ICES Journal of Marine Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 726-737
- ISSN
- 1054-3139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160528945
- Cited by
- 728
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmsc.1997.0243
- The paper
- Furness, R. (1997). Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment. ICES Journal of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1997.0243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.