The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries
Open accessAbstract
Since its development in the early 1980s, the mass-balance approach incorporated in the Ecopath software has been widely used for constructing food-web models of marine and other ecosystems. Generalizations on the structure and functioning of such ecosystems, relevant to the issue of fisheries impacts, have been developed and these have affected the evolution of the Ecopath approach. Thus, the description of the average state of an ecosystem, using Ecopath proper, now serves to parametrize systems of coupled difference and differential equations, which are used to depict changes in biomasses and trophic interactions in time (Ecosim) and space (Ecospace). The outcomes of these simulations can then be used to modify the initial parametrization, and the simulations are rerun until external validation is achieved. This reconceptualization of the Ecopath approach as an iterative process, which helps address issues of structural uncertainty, does not increase its input requirements markedly. Rather, it has become possible, through a Bayesian resampling routine, to explicitly consider the numerical uncertainty associated with these inputs. We present the key features of the reconceptualized approach, and two indices based thereon for quantifying the ecosystem impacts of fisheries. We conclude with a brief discussion of its limitations, both present and intrinsic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., & Torres, F. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.860 · Cited by 4,743
Self-citationWill a Large Complex System be Stable?
MAY, R. M. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238413a0 · Cited by 2,869
Christensen, V., & Pauly, D. (1992) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/0304-3800(92)90016-8 · Cited by 1,347
Self-citation
Cited by
Ecopath with Ecosim: Methods, capabilities and limitations
Christensen, V., & Walters, C. J. (2004) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.003 · Cited by 1,914
Cascading top-down effects of changing oceanic predator abundances
Baum, J. K., & Worm, B. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01531.x · Cited by 932
Interpreting catch per unit effort data to assess the status of individual stocks and communities
Maunder, M. N., Sibert, J. R., Fonteneau, A., Hampton, J., Kleiber, P., & Harley, S. J. (2006) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.05.008 · Cited by 582
Infectious diseases following natural disasters: prevention and control measures
Kouadio, I. K., Aljunid, S., Kamigaki, T., Hammad, K., & Oshitani, H. (2012) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1586/eri.11.155 · Cited by 546
Hundred‐year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes
Christensen, V., Guénette, S., Heymans, J. J., Walters, C. J., Watson, R., Zeller, D., & Pauly, D. (2003) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00103.x · Cited by 466
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pauly, D.
- Venue
- ICES Journal of Marine Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 697-706
- ISSN
- 1054-3139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103037732
- Cited by
- 1,016
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0726
- The paper
- Pauly, D. (2000). Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0726
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.