The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NON-LINEAR ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL OF A CANTILEVER PIPE CONVEYING FLUID
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It was shown that the position of the actuator was important for effectively controlling the vibration of the piping system.”
From Vibration control of fluid-conveying pipes: a state-of-the-art review (2023) · cites this paper as [113]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vibration control of fluid-conveying pipes: a state-of-the-art review
Ding, H., & Ji, J. C. (2023) · Applied Mathematics and Mechanics · doi:10.1007/s10483-023-3023-9 · Cited by 132
“In 1997, Tsai and Lin[112] used a model reference adaptive control approach in a modal space to control the flutter of fluid-conveying cantilever pipes.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, Y.-H., & Tsai, Y.-K.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan Ocean University (TW)
- ORCID
- Lin, Y.-H.
- Venue
- Journal of Sound and Vibration
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 477-490
- ISSN
- 0022-460X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001814856
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sound and Vibration (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
- Keywords
- active vibration control, geometric nonlinearity, instantaneous optimal control, Newmark method, actuator placement, random base excitation, fluid-structure interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
