Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Numerical Model of Nasal Odorant Transport for the Analysis of Human Olfaction

Open access
Keyhani, Keyvan, Scherer, Peter W., Mozell, Maxwell M.·1997·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

The transport and uptake of inspired odorant molecules in the human nasal cavity were determined using an anatomically correct three-dimensional finite element model. The steady-state equations of motion and continuity were first solved to determine laminar flow patterns of odorous air at quiet breathing flow rates. The air stream entering the ventral tip of the naris traveled to the olfactory slit, and then passed through the slit in nearly a straight path without forming separated recirculating zones. The fraction of volumetric flow passing through the olfactory airway was about 10%, and remained nearly constant with variation in flow rate. The three-dimensional inspiratory velocity field was used in the solution of the uncoupled steady convective-diffusion equation to determine the concentration field in the airways and odorant mass flux at the nasal walls. The mass-transfer boundary condition used at the nasal cavity wall included the effects of solubility and diffusivity of odorants in the mucosal lining, and the thickness of the mucus layer. The total olfactory flux of odorants, that is highly correlated with perceived odor intensity, was determined as a function of all transport parameters in our model. Increase in nasal flow rate at a constant inlet concentration resulted in an increase in total olfactory uptake for all odorants. However, with increase in flow rate, the fractional uptake, i.e., total olfactory flux normalized by convective flux at the inlet, decreased for poorly soluble odorants, while it increased for highly soluble odorants. The pattern of flux (or imposed patterning) across the olfactory mucosa, that carries information concerning odor identity, was also determined as a function of transport parameters. There was an overall decrease in odorant flux as the location on the olfactory surface was varied from the anterior towards the posterior and from the inferior towards the superior ends. The flux pattern became more uniform, i.e., the steepness of the flux gradients across the olfactory surface decreased, as the mucus solubility of the odorants decreased. Different odorants generated discernibly different flux patterns across the olfactory mucosa that may contribute to the encoding of odor quality. Variation of total olfactory flux with time after cessation of airflow was determined by solving the unsteady diffusion equation in the air-phase. The flux decreased approximately exponentially with time. The rate of decay decreased as solubility and diffusivity decreased, but was very rapid over a wide range of the parameters, with time constants of less than 0.5 s for most odorants, implying a rapid decrease in perceived odor intensity with cessation of nasal airflow.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0347

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Keyhani, K., Scherer, P. W., & Mozell, M. M.
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-06
Volume
186
Issue
3
Pages
279-301
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046621199
Cited by
191
References
0
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Numerical Model of Nasal Odorant Transport for the Analysis of Human Olfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jtbi.1996.0347
The paper
Keyhani, K., Scherer, P. W., & Mozell, M. M. (1997). A Numerical Model of Nasal Odorant Transport for the Analysis of Human Olfaction. Journal of Theoretical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1996.0347

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.