The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.107.2.289 · Cited by 1,115
Lonsdorf, T. B., Menz, M. M., Andreatta, M., Fullana, M. A., Golkar, A., Haaker, J., Heitland, I., Hermann, A., Kuhn, M., Kruse, O., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026 · Cited by 837
Within Compound Associations Mediate the Retrospective Revaluation of Causality Judgements
Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B · doi:10.1080/713932614 · Cited by 416
De Houwer, J. (2009) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/lb.37.1.1 · Cited by 362
Causal Cognition in Human and Nonhuman Animals: A Comparative, Critical Review
Penn, D. C., & Povinelli, D. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085555 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A.
- Venue
- Learning and Motivation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-151
- ISSN
- 0023-9690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053120016
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/lmot.1994.1008
- The paper
- Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements. Learning and Motivation. https://doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1994.1008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
