The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory and in Vivo Application of Electroporative Gene Delivery
Open accessAbstract
Efficient and safe methods for delivering exogenous genetic material into tissues must be developed before the clinical potential of gene therapy will be realized. Recently, in vivo electroporation has emerged as a leading technology for developing nonviral gene therapies and nucleic acid vaccines (NAV). Electroporation (EP) involves the application of pulsed electric fields to cells to enhance cell permeability, resulting in exogenous polynucleotide transit across the cytoplasmic membrane. Similar pulsed electrical field treatments are employed in a wide range of biotechnological processes including in vitro EP, hybridoma production, development of transgenic animals, and clinical electrochemotherapy. Electroporative gene delivery studies benefit from well-developed literature that may be used to guide experimental design and interpretation. Both theory and experimental analysis predict that the critical parameters governing EP efficacy include cell size and field strength, duration, frequency, and total number of applied pulses. These parameters must be optimized for each tissue in order to maximize gene delivery while minimizing irreversible cell damage. By providing an overview of the theory and practice of electroporative gene transfer, this review intends to aid researchers that wish to employ the method for preclinical and translational gene therapy, NAV, and functional genomic research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Direct Gene Transfer into Mouse Muscle in Vivo
Wolff, J. A., Malone, R. W., Williams, P., Chong, W., Acsadi, G., Jani, A., & Felgner, P. L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1690918 · Cited by 4,173
Self-citationElectrochemotherapy: An emerging drug delivery method for the treatment of cancer
Jaroszeski, M. J., Gilbert, R., & Heller, R. (1997) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00034-3 · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Cited by
Tissue Ablation with Irreversible Electroporation
Davalos, R. V., Mir, L. M., & Rubinsky, B. (2005) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-005-8981-8 · Cited by 1,293
Gene Therapy Progress and Prospects: Nonviral vectors
Niidome, T., & Huang, L. (2002) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301923 · Cited by 963
Nanosecond, high‐intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells
Beebe, S. J., Fox, P. M., Rec, L. J., Willis, L. K., & Schoenbach, K. H. (2003) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.02-0859fje · Cited by 465
Campana, L. G., Mocellin, S., Basso, M., Puccetti, O., De Salvo, G. L., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Vecchiato, A., Corti, L., Rossi, C. R., & Nitti, D. (2009) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-008-0204-8 · Cited by 291
Gene Transfer to Rabbit Retina with Electron Avalanche Transfection
Chalberg, T. W., Vankov, A., Molnar, F. E., Butterwick, A. F., Huie, P., Calos, M. P., & Palanker, D. V. (2006) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0092 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Somiari, S., Glasspool-Malone, J., Drabick, J. J., Gilbert, R. A., Heller, R., Jaroszeski, M. J., & Malone, R. W.
- Venue
- Molecular Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 178-187
- ISSN
- 1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069934604
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory and in Vivo Application of Electroporative Gene Delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/mthe.2000.0124
- The paper
- Somiari, S., Glasspool-Malone, J., Drabick, J. J., Gilbert, R. A., Heller, R., Jaroszeski, M. J., & Malone, R. W. (2000). Theory and in Vivo Application of Electroporative Gene Delivery. Molecular Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1006/mthe.2000.0124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.