An event-related fMRI study of implicit phrase-level syntactic and semantic processing
Open accessAbstract
Most neuroimaging studies of language function to date use a block-subtraction paradigm in which images acquired during relatively long periods of target stimuli are compared to those acquired during a control period. These studies typically require an overt response on the part of the subject, usually some type of discrimination or grammatical judgment by button press, or silent word generation. Results from studies of syntactic and semantic processing have generally been compatible with the classical correlation to Broca's area and Wernicke's area, respectively. Recently, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies departing from the block-subtraction paradigm in favor of event-related fMRI paradigms have been reported. We have extended the use of this approach to examine implicit (i.e., without an explicit task on the part of the subject) syntactic and semantic processing at the phrasal level, using visually presented verb phrases. Left BA 44 is more strongly activated for the syntactic condition than the semantic condition. BA 45, 10, and 46 show laterality differences: mostly left-lateralized for the syntactic condition and right-lateralized for the semantic condition. We also find activations of the inferior parietal lobe, consistent with a visual oddball response reported previously, and the anterior cingulate gyrus (BA 32), implicated for attention and memory-related processes in numerous studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A striking double dissociation was observed with greater activation in the left dorsal pars opercularis for syntactic than semantic processing and greater activation for semantics than syntactics in the ventral inferior frontal gyrus or the right inferior frontal lobe.
“a striking double dissociation was observed with greater activation in the left dorsal pars opercularis for syntactic than semantic processing (Kang et al., 1999; Dapretto and Bookheimer, 1999) and greater activation for semantics than syntactics in the ventral inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47, pars orbitalis; Dapretto and Bookheimer, 1999) or the right inferior frontal lobe (Kang et al., 1999).”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Kang et al., 1999
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- Kang, A. M., Constable, R. T., Gore, J. C., & Avrutin, S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 555-561
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969046098
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- verb phrases, Broca's area, Wernicke's area, left hemisphere lateralization, right hemisphere activation, inferior parietal lobule, anterior cingulate cortex, event-related fMRI, language lateralization
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Arousal, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Dominance, Cerebral, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psycholinguistics, Reading, Reference Values, Semantics, Temporal Lobe, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review