Cited by 227Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceLanguage Development and Disorders

A common language network for comprehension and production: a contribution to the definition of language epicenters with PET

Papathanassiou, D., Etard, O., Mellet, E., Zago, L., Mazoyer, B., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.·2000·NeuroImage

Abstract

In this paper, we report on a PET activation study designed to assess whether functional neuroimaging would help to uncover essential language areas in normal volunteers and to provide a more accurate definition of their localization. Regional cerebral blood flow was repeatedly monitored in eight right-handed male volunteers, while performing a language comprehension task (listening to factual stories) and a language production task (covert generation of verbs semantically related to heard nouns), using silent resting as a control condition. The conjunction analysis, conducted with SPM, was used to uncover the network of activations common to both task that included three left hemisphere areas, namely (1) the pars opercularis and triangularis of the inferior frontal gyrus, (2) the posterior part of the superior temporal cortex centered around the superior temporal sulcus, extending to the planum temporale posterior part but sparing the supramarginalis and angular gyri, and (3) the most anterior part of the left inferior temporal gyrus at the junction with the anterior fusiform gyrus. The inferior and lateral parts of the right cerebellar cortex were also included in the conjunction network. Each of the three cortical areas, when they are site of lesion or electrical stimulation, elicit impairment in both language comprehension and production and can thus be considered as essential to language. Accordingly, the present results provide conservative anatomofunctional definitions of the Broca, Wernicke, and basal language areas. Interestingly, contralateral homologues of Broca's and Wernicke's areas also lighted up in the conjunction analysis that could be related to the interindividual variability of hemispheric language dominance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.2000.0546

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 227

Authors
Papathanassiou, D., Etard, O., Mellet, E., Zago, L., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.
Affiliations
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
347-357
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136260958
Cited by
227
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
language comprehension, language production, Broca's area, Wernicke's area, inferior frontal gyrus, superior temporal cortex, planum temporale, inferior temporal gyrus, cerebellar cortex, interindividual variability, regional cerebral blood flow, conjunction analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebellum, Dominance, Cerebral, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Semantics, Speech Perception, Temporal Lobe, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review