Shear Stress-Induced Nitric Oxide Release Triggers the Liver Regeneration Cascade
Abstract
The trigger of the liver regeneration cascade is currently unknown and has been the subject of debate. We hypothesize that, following 2/3 partial hepatectomy (PHX), an increase in the blood flow-to-liver mass ratio results in shear stress-induced nitric oxide (NO) release, which triggers the liver regeneration cascade. Portal venous pressure (PVP), reflecting shear stress in the liver, increased to the same extent following PHX and selective portal vein branch ligation (PVL), a hemodynamic model of PHX, suggesting similar amounts of shear stress in both models. Two indices of the initiation of the liver regeneration cascade were used: proliferative factor (PF) activity in blood 4 h after PHX or PVL and hepatic c-fos mRNA expression 15 min. after PHX or PVL. PF activity and c-fos mRNA expression were increased to similar extents after PHX and PVL, suggesting a similar stimulus in both models. PF activity and c-fos mRNA expression were inhibited by administration of the nitric oxide synthase antagonist, l-NAME, and the NO donor, SIN-1, reversed the inhibition in both models. These results provide support for the hypothesis that a hemodynamic change results in increased shear stress in the liver causing generation of NO, which then triggers the liver regeneration cascade.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In response to reduced oxygen delivery, endothelial cells release VEGF and nitric oxide, which enhance nutrient and oxygen supply to the remaining liver tissue and support the initiation of regeneration.
“In response, these cells release VEGF and nitric oxide (NO)[25-27], which enhance nutrient and oxygen supply to the remaining liver tissue and support the initiation of the regeneration process.”
From Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: Triggers and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 170
- Authors
- Schoen, J. M., Wang, H. H., Minuk, G. Y., & Lautt, W. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lautt, W.Wayne
- Venue
- Nitric Oxide
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 453-464
- ISSN
- 1089-8603 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064553063
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nitric Oxide (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Keywords
- liver regeneration, shear stress, partial hepatectomy, portal pressure, c-fos mRNA, nitric oxide synthase, L-NAME, SIN-1, hemodynamics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biopsy, Enzyme Inhibitors, Hepatectomy, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Male, Molsidomine, Nitric Oxide, Portal Vein, RNA, Messenger, Stress, Physiological, Blotting, Northern, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Nitric Oxide Synthase, NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester, Rats, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review