Amygdala Modulation of Memory Consolidation: Interaction with Other Brain Systems
Abstract
There is a strong consensus that the amygdala is involved in mediating influences of emotional arousal and stress on learning and memory. There is extensive evidence that the basolateral amygdala (BLA) is a critical locus of integration of neuromodulatory influences regulating the consolidation of several forms of memory. Many drug and stress hormone influences converge in activating the release of norepinephrine (NE) within the BLA. Evidence from studies using in vivo microdialysis and high-performance liquid chromatography indicates that increases in amygdala NE levels assessed following inhibitory avoidance training correlate highly with subsequent retention. Other evidence indicates that NE influences on memory consolidation require muscarinic cholinergic activation within the BLA provided by projections from the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NB). Evidence from several experiments indicates that activation of the BLA plays an essential role in modulating memory consolidation processes involving other brain regions. These findings provide strong support for the hypothesis that the BLA plays a critical role in regulating the consolidation of lasting memories of significant experiences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The central amygdala nucleus (CEA) is rich in stress hormones and their receptors and contributes to processing of stress signals.
“The CEA is rich in stress hormones and their receptors,98, 99, 100, 101 and contributes to processing of stress signals.102, 103, 104”
From Preferential loss of dorsal-hippocampus synapses underlies memory impairments provoked by short, multimodal stress (2014) · cites this paper as [103]
These changes may reflect reduced ability for objective memory and increased emotional salience of the stress.
“Hence, these changes may reflect reduced ability for objective memory and increased emotional salience of the stress.103”
From Preferential loss of dorsal-hippocampus synapses underlies memory impairments provoked by short, multimodal stress (2014) · cites this paper as [103]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 279
- Authors
- McGaugh, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- McGaugh, J
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 539-552
- ISSN
- 1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054759905
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH12526, F32MH012646, MH 12646)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- amygdala, memory consolidation, basolateral amygdala, norepinephrine, muscarinic receptors, nucleus basalis magnocellularis, stress hormones, emotional arousal, passive avoidance, cholinergic modulation, stress and learning
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Cholinergic Fibers, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Humans, Memory, Norepinephrine, Oxotremorine, Physostigmine, Receptors, Muscarinic, Muscarinic Antagonists, Basal Nucleus of Meynert
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review