A Multiattribute Evaluation Approach to Structural Change in Resource Dilemmas
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Actors' attitudes toward fairness inform resource allocation decisions that are not necessarily in the best interests of the focal firm.
“Actors' attitudes toward fairness inform resource allocation decisions that are not necessarily in the best interests of the focal firm.”
From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Samuelson 1993
Network arrangements can lead to decision biases because managers align their firms' future activities with the past to preserve social capital, believing that conservative actions will be perceived as fairer by counterparts in partner firms.
“Such network arrangements can also lead to decision biases, not least because managers choose to align their firms' future activities with the past, in an attempt to preserve SC, believing that their conservative actions will be perceived as fairer by their counterparts in partner firms (Samuelson 1993).”
From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Samuelson 1993
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 73
- Authors
- Samuelson, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Samuelson, Charles D.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 298-324
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049705469
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- resource dilemmas, social dilemmas, structural change, multi-attribute utility, social value orientation, fairness, overexploitation, allocation systems, inequity, group decision making, interactionism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
