The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Roles of Altruism, Free Riding, and Bandwagoning in Vaccination Decisions
Open accessAbstract
Because vaccines can reduce the ability to transmit a contagious disease to others as well as the ability to contract a disease, the decision to vaccinate might be motivated in part by patients′ tendencies to act altruistically or, alternatively, to free ride on the vaccination decisions of others. We hypothesized that altruism and free riding motivate decisions to obtain vaccination, that individuals can be persuaded by the way questions are framed to free ride or to act altruistically, and that some individuals make vaccination decisions by "jumping on the bandwagon" and doing what most other people do. Four-hundred and seventy-two subjects answered whether they would agree to be vaccinated against a contagious disease under six different hypothetical scenarios. Regression analysis provides evidence that altruism (p < .001), free riding (p < .001), and bandwagoning (p < .001) are significant motivators in the decision to undergo vaccination. Frames stressing the opportunity to free ride increase free riding. Frames stressing altruism do not increase altruism. If generalizable to other settings, these results suggest that public health programs to increase vaccine usage should stress high vaccination rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action
Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J., & Kempe, A. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618760521 · Cited by 1,233
Statistical physics of vaccination
Wang, Z., Bauch, C. T., Bhattacharyya, S., d'Onofrio, A., Manfredi, P., Perc, M., Perra, N., Salathé, M., & Zhao, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.006 · Cited by 872
Qualitative analysis of mothers’ decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust
Benin, A. L., Wisler-Scher, D. J., Colson, E., Shapiro, E. D., & Holmboe, E. S. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1728 · Cited by 608
Using behavioral insights to increase vaccination policy effectiveness
Betsch, C., Böhm, R., & Chapman, G. B. (2015) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732215600716 · Cited by 378
Jordan, J. J., Yoeli, E., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97617-5 · Cited by 350
Metadata
- Authors
- Hershey, J. C., Asch, D. A., Thumasathit, T., Meszaros, J., & Waters, V. V.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-187
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050571821
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Roles of Altruism, Free Riding, and Bandwagoning in Vaccination Decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/obhd.1994.1055
- The paper
- Hershey, J. C., Asch, D. A., Thumasathit, T., Meszaros, J., & Waters, V. V. (1994). The Roles of Altruism, Free Riding, and Bandwagoning in Vaccination Decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
