The influence of early and frequent use of marijuana on the risk of desistance and of progression to marijuana-related harm
Abstract
Background A significant minority of lifetime marijuana users will eventually receive a diagnosis of abuse or dependence. Yet little is known regarding the effect of age at onset and frequency of lifetime marijuana use on desistance from use and on progression to marijuana disorders.Methods To address this issue, data were obtained from a community sample of 2,729 lifetime marijuana users participating in the Ontario Mental Health Supplement.Results Early and frequent lifetime marijuana use was associated with highly persistent use and rapid progression to marijuana-related harm. Multivariate analyses revealed a monotonic increase in the risk of desistance with less frequent categories of use and later ages of onset. Results also indicated a threshold of use (100-199 times) associated with an elevated risk of developing marijuana disorders. A lower threshold of risk for marijuana problems was observed for females (50-99 times).Conclusions Early and frequent marijuana use are potent risk factors for prolonging desistance and hastening marijuana-related harm. Required are prevention programs aimed at delaying the onset of first use as well as harm reduction strategies that encourage cessation or reduced levels of consumption among those already using.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early drug use is consistently associated with higher risk of developing substance use disorders.
“Early drug use is consistently associated with higher risk of developing substance use disorders (Chou and Pickering, 1992; Clark et al., 1998; DeWit et al., 2000; Grant and Dawson, 1998; Hawkins et al., 1997; Lynskey et al., 2003; O’Brien and Anthony, 2005; Prescott and Kendler, 1999; SAMHSA, 2013)”
From Does puberty mark a transition in sensitive periods for plasticity in the associative neocortex? (2017) · cites this paper as DeWit et al., 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- DeWit, D. J., Hance, J., Offord, D. R., & Ogborne, A.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- Hamilton Health Sciences (CA)
- Corresponding author
- DeWit, David J.
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 455-464
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032489659
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- cannabis use, age of onset, usage frequency, cannabis use disorder, substance use disorders, harm reduction, prevention, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Marijuana Abuse, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review