Psychosocial Correlates of Physical Activity and Sedentary Leisure Habits in Young Adolescents: The Teens Eating for Energy and Nutrition at School Study
Abstract
Background Low levels of physical activity (PA) and highly sedentary leisure habits (SLH) in youth may establish behavioral patterns that will predispose youth to increased chronic disease risk in adulthood. The purpose of this paper was to examine associations of demographic and psychosocial factors with self-reported PA and SLH in young adolescents. Methods A general linear mixed model predicted self-reported PA and SLH in the spring from demographic and psychosocial variables measured the previous fall in 3798 seventh grade students. Results PA and SLH differed by race, with Caucasian students reporting among the highest PA and lowest SLH. Perceptions of higher academic rank or expectations predicted higher PA and lower SLH. Depressive symptomatology predicted higher SLH scores but not PA. Higher self-reported value of health, appearance, and achievement predicted higher PA and lower SLH in girls. Girls who reported that their mothers had an authoritative parenting style also reported higher PA and lower SLH. Conclusions Determinants of PA and SLH appear to differ from each other, particularly in boys. Development of effective programs to increase PA and/or decrease SLH in young adolescents should be based on a clear understanding of the determinants of these behaviors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This may be particularly important for children and adolescents from low socioeconomic backgrounds, who typically engage in greater amounts of screen time and are also less likely to live in green neighbourhoods.
“This may be particularly important for children and adolescents from low socioeconomic backgrounds, who typically engage in greater amounts of ST [48–51] and are also less likely to live in green neighbourhoods [52].”
From Psychological impacts of “screen time” and “green time” for children and adolescents: A systematic scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 274
- Authors
- Schmitz, K. H., Lytle, L. A., Phillips, G. A., Murray, D. M., Birnbaum, A. S., & Kubik, M. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Memphis (US)
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 266-278
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012727124
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA071943, 5R01 CA 71943-03)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
- Keywords
- physical activity, adolescents, psychosocial factors, racial differences, depressive symptoms, value orientations, authoritative parenting, gender differences, chronic disease risk, school-based research
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Diet, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Minnesota, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Risk Factors, Health Behavior, Exercise, Parenting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review