Cited by 73Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsPesticide Exposure and ToxicitySexual Differentiation and Disorders

Pre- and postnatal oral toxicity of vinclozolin in Wistar and Long-Evans rats

Hellwig, J., van Ravenzwaay, B., Mayer, M., Gembardt, C.·2000·Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Abstract

Vinclozolin administered to pregnant Wistar and Long-Evans rats from day 14 postcoitum to day 3 postpartum at 200 mg/kg body wt/day was maternally toxic (reduced food consumption and body weight gain) and increased perinatal mortality; major adverse effects on sex-specific organs in male offspring were seen (reduced anogenital distance and index; persistence of nipples/areolas into adulthood; hypospadic penis; penile hypoplasia or development of a vaginal pouch; transient paraphimosis; hypoplasia and chronic inflammation of epididymides, prostate, seminal vesicles, and coagulating glands; and also testicular tubular atrophy and chronic inflammation of the urinary bladder in some Long-Evans) with isolated inflammation-related deaths due to pyelonephritis. At 12 mg/kg, prevalence of female areola/nipple anlagen in immature (preweaning) male offspring was increased in both strains; these persisted to adulthood in a few treated Long-Evans but not Wistar offspring. Adult Long-Evans but not Wistar at this dose also had hypoplasia of prostate, seminal vesicles, and coagulating glands, and a minority had testicular tubular atrophy. The no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAEL) were 12 and 6 mg/kg body wt in Wistar and Long-Evans rats, respectively, in these studies. The data suggest that both the Long-Evans and the Wistar rats are comparably sensitive to the antiandrogenic effects of vinclozolin. At dose levels below the NOAEL (1 and 3 mg/kg, respectively), there were no indications…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/rtph.2000.1400

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hellwig, J., van Ravenzwaay, B., Mayer, M., & Gembardt, C.
Affiliations
BASF (Germany) (DE)
Venue
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
42-50
ISSN
0273-2300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005961817
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
vinclozolin, oral toxicity, prenatal exposure, perinatal toxicity, maternal toxicity, antiandrogenic effects, anogenital distance, hypospadias, cystitis, pyelonephritis, no-observed-adverse-effect level, strain differences, Wistar rats, Long-Evans rats
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Androgen Antagonists, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Female, Fetal Death, Fungicides, Industrial, Genitalia, Male, Male, Organ Size, Oxazoles, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sex Characteristics, Species Specificity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Toxicity Tests, No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level, Rats, Long-Evans, Fetal Weight, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review