Cited by 130Computational Drug Discovery MethodsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships for Androgen Receptor Ligands

Waller, Chris L., Juma, Booker W., Gray, Jr., L.Earl, Kelce, William R.·1996·Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology

Abstract

Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) paradigm, was used to examine androgen receptor-binding affinities of a series of structurally diverse natural, synthetic, and environmental chemicals of interest. The CoMFA/3D-QSAR model successfully illustrates that the overall steric and electrostatic properties of structurally diverse ligands for the androgen receptor are necessary and sufficient to describe the binding affinity. The practical utility of models of this type is demonstrated using parent compounds in the training set and known as well as putative biological metabolites as test set molecules. The ability of the model to accurately predict binding affinity of test set molecules suggests that structure-based 3D-QSAR models may be used to supplement the process of hazard identification. The application of 3D-QSAR models within a toxicological framework is, at present, limited by the quantity and quality of biological data for relevant biomarkers of toxicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/taap.1996.0075

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waller, C. L., Juma, B. W., Gray, Jr., & Kelce, W. R.
Affiliations
Environmental Protection Agency (US)
Venue
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-04
Volume
137
Issue
2
Pages
219-227
ISSN
0041-008X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060155493
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
androgen receptor, CoMFA, 3D-QSAR, binding affinity prediction, environmental chemicals, synthetic compounds, hazard identification
MeSH terms
Ligands, Models, Molecular, Receptors, Androgen, Steroids, Structure-Activity Relationship, Hazardous Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review