Physicochemical Differences in the AH Receptors of the Most TCDD-Susceptible and the Most TCDD-Resistant Rat Strains
Abstract
Long-Evans rats (strain Turku AB; L-E) are at least 1000-fold more sensitive (LD50 about 10 microg/kg) to the acute lethal effects of 2, 3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) than are Han/Wistar (Kuopio; H/W) rats (LD50 > 9600 microg/kg). The AH receptor (AHR) is believed to mediate the toxic effects of TCDD and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. We compared the AHRs of L-E and H/W rats to determine if there were any structural or functional receptor differences that might be related to the dramatic difference in the sensitivity of these two strains to the lethal effects of TCDD. Cytosols from liver and lung of the sensitive L-E rats contained about twofold higher levels of specific binding sites for [3H]TCDD than occurred in H/W rats; the Kd for binding of [3H]TCDD to AHR in hepatic cytosols was similar between the two strains. Addition of the oxyanions, molybdate or tungstate (20 mM), had little effect upon ligand binding to AHR in hepatic cytosols from L-E rats whereas in cytosols from H/W rats these agents substantially diminished or totally abolished TCDD binding. The AHR in H/W cytosols also lost ligand-binding function when NaCl (20 to 400 mM) was added to the buffer whereas, in cytosols from L-E rats, the addition of 400 mM NaCl caused the receptor complex to shift from 9S to 6S during velocity sedimentation but did not destroy ligand binding function. AHR from hepatic cytosol of both the L-E and H/W rats could be transformed to the DNA-binding state in the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Considerable variation in the size and primary amino acid sequence of the AHR is common across and within animal species, with receptor molecular weights ranging from 95 kDa (C57BL/6 or B6 mouse) to 124 kDa (hamster).
“Considerable variation in the size and primary amino acid sequence of the AHR is common across and within animal species, with receptor molecular weights ranging from 95 kDa (C57BL/6 or B6 mouse) to 124 kDa (hamster) (Pohjanvirta et al., 1999; Poland et al., 1991).”
From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Pohjanvirta et al., 1999
Cites
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Complex
Hankinson, O. (1995) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pa.35.040195.001515 · Cited by 1,649 · see citing works
Analysis of the four alleles of the murine aryl hydrocarbon receptor
Poland, A., Palen, D., & Glover, E. (1994) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(25)09833-5 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Mapping the 90 kDa heat shock protein binding region of the Ah receptor
Perdew, G. H., & Bradfield, C. A. (1996) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1080/15216549600201651 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Godoy, P., Hewitt, N. J., Albrecht, U., Andersen, M. E., Ansari, N., Bhattacharya, S., Bode, J. G., Bolleyn, J., Borner, C., Böttger, J., et al. (2013) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1078-5 · Cited by 1,280 · see citing works
Aryl hydrocarbon receptors: diversity and evolution
Hahn, M. E. (2002) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/s0009-2797(02)00070-4 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Hahn, M. E., Karchner, S. I., Franks, D. G., & Merson, R. R. (2004) · Pharmacogenetics · doi:10.1097/00008571-200402000-00007 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling
Wilson, R. H., & Bradfield, C. A. (2021) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.1080/03602532.2021.1955916 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Like mice, naturally occurring polymorphisms at the rat Ahr locus have provided models that have shed light on AHR signal transduction (Pohjanvirta et al. 1987, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Pohjanvirta, R., Viluksela, M., Tuomisto, J. T., Unkila, M., Karasinska, J., Franc, M.-A., Holowenko, M., Giannone, J. V., Harper, P. A., Tuomisto, J., & Okey, A. B.
- Venue
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-95
- ISSN
- 0041-008X
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review