Cited by 79

Physicochemical Differences in the AH Receptors of the Most TCDD-Susceptible and the Most TCDD-Resistant Rat Strains

Pohjanvirta, Raimo, Viluksela, Matti, Tuomisto, Jouni T., Unkila, Mikko, Karasinska, Joanna, Franc, Monique-Andrée, Holowenko, Mary, Giannone, John V. +3 more·1999·Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology

Abstract

Long-Evans rats (strain Turku AB; L-E) are at least 1000-fold more sensitive (LD50 about 10 microg/kg) to the acute lethal effects of 2, 3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) than are Han/Wistar (Kuopio; H/W) rats (LD50 > 9600 microg/kg). The AH receptor (AHR) is believed to mediate the toxic effects of TCDD and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. We compared the AHRs of L-E and H/W rats to determine if there were any structural or functional receptor differences that might be related to the dramatic difference in the sensitivity of these two strains to the lethal effects of TCDD. Cytosols from liver and lung of the sensitive L-E rats contained about twofold higher levels of specific binding sites for [3H]TCDD than occurred in H/W rats; the Kd for binding of [3H]TCDD to AHR in hepatic cytosols was similar between the two strains. Addition of the oxyanions, molybdate or tungstate (20 mM), had little effect upon ligand binding to AHR in hepatic cytosols from L-E rats whereas in cytosols from H/W rats these agents substantially diminished or totally abolished TCDD binding. The AHR in H/W cytosols also lost ligand-binding function when NaCl (20 to 400 mM) was added to the buffer whereas, in cytosols from L-E rats, the addition of 400 mM NaCl caused the receptor complex to shift from 9S to 6S during velocity sedimentation but did not destroy ligand binding function. AHR from hepatic cytosol of both the L-E and H/W rats could be transformed to the DNA-binding state in the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/taap.1998.8565

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considerable variation in the size and primary amino acid sequence of the AHR is common across and within animal species, with receptor molecular weights ranging from 95 kDa (C57BL/6 or B6 mouse) to 124 kDa (hamster).

    “Considerable variation in the size and primary amino acid sequence of the AHR is common across and within animal species, with receptor molecular weights ranging from 95 kDa (C57BL/6 or B6 mouse) to 124 kDa (hamster) (Pohjanvirta et al., 1999; Poland et al., 1991).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Pohjanvirta et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pohjanvirta, R., Viluksela, M., Tuomisto, J. T., Unkila, M., Karasinska, J., Franc, M.-A., Holowenko, M., Giannone, J. V., Harper, P. A., Tuomisto, J., & Okey, A. B.
Venue
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-02
Volume
155
Issue
1
Pages
82-95
ISSN
0041-008X
Cited by
79
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review