The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial Aspects of Interspecific Competition
Open accessAbstract
Using several variants of a stochastic spatial model introduced by Silvertown et al., we investigate the effect of spatial distribution of individuals on the outcome of competition. First, we prove rigorously that if one species has a competitive advantage over each of the others, then eventually it takes over all the sites in the system. Second, we examine tradeoffs between competition and dispersal distance in a two-species system. Third, we consider a cyclic competitive relationship between three types. In this case, a nonspatial treatment leads to densities that follow neutrally stable cycles or even unstable spiral solutions, while a spatial model yields a stationary distribution with an interesting spatial structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803
Cited by
Antibiotic-mediated antagonism leads to a bacterial game of rock–paper–scissors in vivo
Kirkup, B. C., & Riley, M. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02429 · Cited by 555
Counteraction of antibiotic production and degradation stabilizes microbial communities
Kelsic, E. D., Zhao, J., Vetsigian, K., & Kishony, R. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14485 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Durrett, R., & Levin, S.
- Venue
- Theoretical Population Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-43
- ISSN
- 0040-5809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086992004
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial Aspects of Interspecific Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/tpbi.1997.1338
- The paper
- Durrett, R., & Levin, S. (1998). Spatial Aspects of Interspecific Competition. Theoretical Population Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.1997.1338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.