The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Protective Role of Coastal Marshes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Shepard, C. C., Crain, C. M., & Beck, M. W. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027374 · Cited by 668
Nagelkerken, I., Sheaves, M., Baker, R., & Connolly, R. M. (2015) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12057 · Cited by 533
Role of Crab Herbivory in Die‐Off of New England Salt Marshes
HOLDREDGE, C., BERTNESS, M. D., & ALTIERI, A. H. (2009) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01137.x · Cited by 178
Variable responses within epiphytic and benthic microalgal communities to nutrient enrichment
Armitage, A. R., Frankovich, T. A., & Fourqurean, J. W. (2006) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-006-0146-8 · Cited by 68
Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration
Diefenderfer, H. L., Johnson, G. E., Thom, R. M., Buenau, K. E., Weitkamp, L. A., Woodley, C. M., Borde, A. B., & Kropp, R. K. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1242 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2000
- OpenAlex
- W584510310
- Cited by
- 1,151
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/0-306-47534-0
- The paper
- Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. (2000). Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47534-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
