The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Ideal Binary Mask As the Computational Goal of Auditory Scene Analysis
Abstract
In his famous treatise of computational vision, Marr (1982) makes a compelling argument for separating different levels of analysis in order to understand complex information processing. In particular, the computational theory level, concerned with the goal of computation and general processing strategy, must be separated from the algorithm level, or the separation of what from how. This chapter is an attempt at a computational-theory analysis of auditory scene analysis, where the main task is to understand the character of the CASA problem. My analysis results in the proposal of the ideal binary mask as a main goal of CASA. This goal is consistent with characteristics of human auditory scene analysis. The goal is also consistent with more specific objectives such as enhancing ASR and speech intelligibility. The resulting evaluation metric has the properties of simplicity and generality, and is easy to apply when the premixing target is available. The goal of the ideal binary mask has led to effective for speech separation algorithms that attempt to explicitly estimate such masks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Cited by
Conv-TasNet: Surpassing Ideal Time–Frequency Magnitude Masking for Speech Separation
Luo, Y., & Mesgarani, N. (2019) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2019.2915167 · Cited by 2,042
Supervised Speech Separation Based on Deep Learning: An Overview
Wang, D., & Chen, J. (2018) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2018.2842159 · Cited by 1,524
Self-citationIdeal ratio mask estimation using deep neural networks for robust speech recognition
Narayanan, A., & Wang, D. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6639038 · Cited by 526
Self-citationDeep Learning for Environmentally Robust Speech Recognition: An Overview of Recent Developments
Zhang, Z., Geiger, J., Pohjalainen, J., Mousa, A. E.-D., Jin, W., & Schuller, B. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3178115 · Cited by 313
A Tandem Algorithm for Pitch Estimation and Voiced Speech Segregation
Hu, G., & Wang, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2010.2041110 · Cited by 288
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D.
- Venue
- Speech Separation by Humans and Machines
- Publisher
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Published
- 2006-01-10
- Pages
- 181-197
- OpenAlex
- W160800111
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 61.21
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Ideal Binary Mask As the Computational Goal of Auditory Scene Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/0-387-22794-6_12
- The paper
- Wang, D. (2006). On Ideal Binary Mask As the Computational Goal of Auditory Scene Analysis. Speech Separation by Humans and Machines. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22794-6_12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.