The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulated Annealing
Open accessAbstract
Many problems in engineering, planning and manufacturing can be modeled as that of minimizing or maximizing a cost function over a finite set of discrete variables. This class of so-called combinatorial optimization problems has received much attention over the last two decades and major achievements have been made in its analysis ( Papadimitriou and Steiglitz, 1982 ). One of these achievements is the separation of this class into two subclasses. The first one contains the problems that can be solved efficiently, i.e. problems for which algorithms are known that solve each instance to optimality in polynomial time. Examples are linear programming, matching and network problems. The second subclass contains the problems that are notoriously hard, formally referred to as NP-hard (see Chapter 11 for more details). For an NP-hard algorithm it is generally believed that no algorithm exists that solves each instance in polynomial time. Consequently, there are instances that require superpolynomial or exponential time to be solved to optimality. Many known problems belong to this class and probably the best known example is the traveling salesman problem. The above-mentioned distinction is supported by a general framework in computer science called complexity theory; for a detailed introduction and an extensive listing of provably hard problems see Garey and Johnson (1979) and Ausiello et al. (1999). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines
Ackley, D. H., Hinton, G. E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1985) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0901_7 · Cited by 3,402
Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach
Arora, S., & Barak, B. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804090 · Cited by 1,690
Cited by
Water Distribution Network Design Optimization: Simulated Annealing Approach
Cunha, M. D. C., & Sousa, J. (1999) · Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1999)125:4(215 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- Aarts, E., Korst, J., & Michiels, W.
- Venue
- Search Methodologies
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2003-12-31
- Pages
- 187-210
- OpenAlex
- W3217754276
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulated Annealing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/0-387-28356-0_7
- The paper
- Aarts, E., Korst, J., & Michiels, W. (2006). Simulated Annealing. Search Methodologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28356-0_7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.