CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Scale as Artifact: GIS, Ecological Fallacy, and Archaeological Analysis

Harris, Trevor M.·2006·Confronting Scale in Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/0-387-32773-8_4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/0-387-32773-8_4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Addicott, J. F., Aho, J. M., Antolin, M. F., Padilla, D. K., Richardson, J. S., and Soluk, D. A., 1987, Ecological Neighborhoods: Scaling Environmental Patterns. OIKOS 49:340–346. · DOI
  2. Alker, H. R., 1969, A Typology of Ecological Fallacies. In Quantitative Ecological Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by M. Dogan and S. Rokkan, pp. 69–86. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  3. Bird, J., 1956, Scale in Regional Study: Illustrated by Brief Comparisons Between the Western Peninsulas of England and France. Geography 41:25–38.
  4. Bird, J. H., 1989, The Changing Worlds of Geography: A Critical Guide to Concepts and Methods. [See especially Chapter 2: Problems of Scale, 19–43]. Oxford University Press, New York.
  5. Cao, C., and Lam, N. S.-N., 1996, Understanding the Scale and Resolution Effects in Remote Sensing and GIS. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, edited by D.A. Quattrochi and M.F. Goodchild, pp. 57–72. Lewis Publications, Boca Raton, FL.
  6. Cleave, N., Brown, P. J., and Payne, C. D., 1995, Evaluation of Methods for Ecological Inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 158(1):55–72. · DOI
  7. Dale, V. H., Gardner, R. H., and Turner, M. G., 1989, Predicting Across Scales. Landscape Ecology 3(3–4):147–151. · DOI
  8. Delcourt, H. R., Delcourt, P. A. and Webb, T., 1983, Dynamic plant ecology: the spectrum of vegetational change in space and time, Quatenary Science Reviews, 1:153–175. · DOI
  9. Dummer, T., 2002, GIS, Mapping and Health: A Study of Stillbirth Rates in Cumbria. Bulletin of the Society of Cartographers 36(2):31–38.
  10. Dungan, J. L., Perry, J. N., Dale, M. R. T., Legendre, P., Citron-Pousty, S., Fortin, M.-J., Jakoumulska, A., Miriti, M., and Rosenberg, M. S., 2002, A Balanced View of Scale in Spatial Statistical Analysis. Ecography 25:626–640. · DOI
  11. Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., and Charlton, M., 2001, Scale Issues and Geographically Weighted Regression. In Modelling Scale in Geographical Information Science, edited by N. J. Tate and P. M. Atkinson, pp. 123–140. Wiley, New York.
  12. Gardner, R. H., O’Neill, R. V., Turner, M. G., and Dale, V. H., 1989, Quantifying Scale-Dependent Effects of Animal Movement With Simple Percolation Models. Landscape Ecology 3(3–4):217–227. · DOI
  13. Goodchild, M. F., 2001, Models of Scale and Scales of Modeling. In Modelling Scale in Geographical Information Science, edited by N. J. Tate and P.M. Atkinson, pp. 3–10. Wiley, New York.
  14. Goodchild, M. F., and Quattrachi, D. A., 1996, Introduction: Scale, Multiscaling, Remote Sensing, and GIS. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, edited by D. A. Quattrachi and M. F. Goodchild, pp. 1–11. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
  15. Gregory, D., 1994. Scale. In The Dictionary of Human Geography, edited by R. J. Johnston, D. Gregory, and D. M. Smith, p. 543. Third Edition. Blackwell, Oxford. · DOI
  16. Haggett, P., 1965, Scale Components in Geographical Problems. In Frontiers in Geographical Teaching, edited by R. J. Chorley and P. Haggett, pp. 164–185. Methuen, London.
  17. Harvey, D. W., 1968, Pattern, Process and the Scale Problem in Geographical Research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45:71–78. · DOI
  18. Harvey, D., 1969, Explanation in Geography. Edward Arnold, London.
  19. Herod, A., and Wright, M., 2002, Geographies of Power: Placing Scale. Blackwell, Oxford. · DOI
  20. Heywood, I., Cornelius, S. and Carver. S., 2002, An Introduction to Geographical Information Systems, Prentice Hall, New York.
  21. Holt, D., Steel, D. G., Tranmer, M., and Wrigley, N., 1996, Aggregation and Ecological Effects in Geographically Based Data. Geographical Analysis 28(3):244–261. · DOI
  22. Hudson, J., 1992, Scale in space and time. In Geography’s inner worlds: pervasive themes in contemporary American geography, edited by R. F. Abler, M. G. Marcus and J. M. Olsen, pp. 280–297. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
  23. Jarvis, P. G. and McNaughton, K. G., 1986, Stomatal control of transpiration: Scaling up from leaf to region, Advances in Ecological Research, 15:1–49. · DOI
  24. Johnston, R. J., and Pattie, C., 2001, On Geographers and Ecological Inference. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91(2):281–282. · DOI
  25. Johnston, R. J., and Rossiter, D. J., 1982, Constituency Building, Political Representation and Electoral Bias in Urban England. In Geography and Urban Environment: Progress in Research and Applications, Volume 5, edited by D. T. Herbert and R. J. Johnston, pp. 113–155. Wiley, New York.
  26. King, G., 1997, A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing individual Behavior From Aggregate Data. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  27. Kousser, J. M., 2001, Ecological Inference from Goodman to King. Historical Methods 34(3):101–115. · DOI
  28. Krieger, N., Chen, J. T., Waterman, P. D., Soobader, M-J., Subramanian, S. V., and Carson, R., 2002, Geocoding and Monitoring of US Socioeconomic inequalities in Mortality and Cancer incidence: Does the Choice of Area-Based Measure and Geographic Level Matter? American Journal of Epidemiology 156(5):471–482. · DOI
  29. Levin, S. A., 1992, The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology. Ecology 73(6):1943–1967. · DOI
  30. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1977, Fractal: Form, Chance, and Dimension. Freeman, San Francisco.
  31. Mcmaster, R. B., and Sheppard, E., editors, 2004, Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method. Blackwell, Bodmin, Cornwall.
  32. Meentemeyer, V., 1989, Geographical Perspectives of Space, Time, and Scale. Landscape Ecology 3(3–4):163–173. · DOI
  33. Mennis, J., 2002, Using Geographic information Systems to Create and Analyze Statistical Surfaces of Population and Risk for Environmental Justice Analysis. Social Science Quarterly 83(1):281–297. · DOI
  34. Nakaya, T., 2000, An Information Statistical Approach to the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Incidence Rate Maps. Environment and Planning A 32:91–109. · DOI
  35. Openshaw, S., 1983, The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography 38. Norwich, Geo Books.
  36. Openshaw, S., 1984, Ecological Fallacies and the Analysis of Areal Census Data, Environment and Planning A 6:17–31. · DOI
  37. Openshaw S., and Alvandies, S., 1999, Applying Geocomputation to the Analysis of Spatial Distributions. In Geographic Information Systems: Principles and Technical Issues, Volume 1, edited by P. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. Maguire, and D. Rhind, pp. 267–282. Second Edition. Wiley, New York.
  38. Openshaw, S., and Taylor, P. J., 1979, A Million or So Correlation Coefficients: Three Experiments on the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. In Statistical Methods in the Spatial Sciences, edited by R. J. Bennett, N. J. Thrift, and N. Wrigley, pp. 127–144. Pion, London.
  39. Openshaw, S., and Taylor, P. J., 1981, The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. In Quantitative Geography: A British View, edited by N. Wrigley and R. J. Bennet, pp. 60–70. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
  40. Robinson, W. S., 1950, Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review 15(3):351–357. · DOI
  41. Schwartz, S., 1994, The Fallacy of the Ecological Fallacy: the Potential Misuse of a Concept and the Consequences. American Journal of Public Health 84(5):819–824. · DOI
  42. Smith, N., 2000, Scale. In The Dictionary of Human Geography, edited by R. J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, and M. Watts. Fourth Edition, Blackwell, Oxford.
  43. Tate, N. J., and Atkinson, P. M., editors, 2001, Modelling Scale in Geographical Information Science. Wiley, New York.
  44. Tate, N. J., and Wood, J., 2001, Fractals and Scale Dependencies in Topography. In Modelling Scale in Geographical Information Science, edited by N. J. Tate and P.M. Atkinson, pp. 35–51. Wiley, New York.
  45. Tranmer, M., and Steel, D. G., 1998, Using Census Data to Investigate the Causes of the Ecological Fallacy. Environment and Planning A 30:817–831. · DOI
  46. Tobler, W. R., 1989, Frame independent spatial analysis. In Accuracy of spatial databases, edited by M. F. Goodchild and S. Gopal, pp. 115–122, Taylor and Francis, London.
  47. Turner, M. G., O’Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H., and Milne, B. T., 1989, Effects of Changing Spatial Scale on the Analysis of Landscape Pattern. Landscape Ecology 3(3–4):153–162. · DOI
  48. Watson, M. K., 1978, The Scale Problem in Human Geography. Geografiska Annaler 60B:36–47. · DOI
  49. Wiens, J. A., Stenseth, N. C., Van Horne, B., and Ims, R. A., 1993, Ecological Mechanisms and Landscape Ecology. OIKOS 66:369–380. · DOI
  50. Withers, S. D., 2001, Quantitative Methods: Advancement in Ecological inference, Progress in Human Geography, 25(1):87–96. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harris, T. M.
Venue
Confronting Scale in Archaeology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2006
Pages
39-53
DOI
10.1007/0-387-32773-8_4
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review