Cited by 228Higher Education Governance and DevelopmentSouth African History and CultureHigher Education Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Higher Education Landscape Under Apartheid

Bunting, Ian·2006·Higher Education Dynamics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/1-4020-4006-7_3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mamdani, M. (1998). Is African Studies to be Turned into a New Home for Bantu Education at UCT? Centre for African Studies, University of Cape Town. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bunting, I.
Corresponding author
Bunting, Ian
Venue
Higher Education Dynamics
Published
2006
Pages
35-52
ISSN
1571-0378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W38308510
Cited by
228
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
41.41
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Higher education dynamics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › South African History and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
apartheid, higher education, South Africa, historically disadvantaged universities, technikons, school segregation, student enrollment, University of Cape Town, Wits University, higher education policy, democratic transition, higher education equity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review