The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disciplines and Doctorates
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In STEM, the”
From Assessing the person or the project? How disciplinary ontological and epistemological assumptions shape doctoral admissions in elite UK institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Parry, 2007
In the citing paper
“In turn, in these disciplines, supervision plays a key role in doctoral students' experiences (Deuchar, 2008;Pyhältö et al., 2015), as students need supervisors who have the knowledge to guide their particular projects (Parry, 2007).”
From Assessing the person or the project? How disciplinary ontological and epistemological assumptions shape doctoral admissions in elite UK institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Parry, 2007
In the citing paper
“For doctoral education, this means PhD students must fit within an existing lab and be equipped with the skills needed to contribute to the larger project (Parry, 2007).”
From Assessing the person or the project? How disciplinary ontological and epistemological assumptions shape doctoral admissions in elite UK institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Parry, 2007
In the citing paper
“Despite increasing emphasis on interdisciplinary research in funding and research assessment, disciplinarity remains at the core of many PhD programmes, as discipline shapes the nature of knowledge production, supervision (Becher, 1989;Delamont et al., 2000;Parry, 2007), and research communication (Bazerman, 1988).”
From Assessing the person or the project? How disciplinary ontological and epistemological assumptions shape doctoral admissions in elite UK institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Parry, 2007
In the citing paper
“Despite increasing emphasis on interdisciplinary research in funding and research assessment, disciplinarity remains at the core of many PhD programmes, as discipline shapes the nature of knowledge production, supervision (Becher, 1989;Delamont et al., 2000;Parry, 2007), and research communication (Bazerman, 1988).”
From Assessing the person or the project? How disciplinary ontological and epistemological assumptions shape doctoral admissions in elite UK institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Parry, 2007
3 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cumulative Advantage in the Skill Development of STEM Graduate Students: A Mixed-Methods Study
Feldon, D. F., Maher, M. A., Roksa, J., & Peugh, J. (2016) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831215619942 · Cited by 31
Inouye, K., Robson, J., Anaiz, P. R., Baker, S., & Ilie, S. (2026) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-025-01438-8 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Parry, S.
- Venue
- Higher Education Dynamics
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2007
- ISSN
- 1571-0378
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disciplines and Doctorates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/1-4020-5312-6
- The paper
- Parry, S. (2007). Disciplines and Doctorates. Higher Education Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5312-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
