The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
In electronics manufacturing, the required quality of electronic modules (e.g.packaged electronic devices) are evaluated through qualification testing using standards and user-defined requirements.The challenge for the electronics industry is that product qualification testing is time-consuming and costly.This paper focuses on the development and demonstration of a novel approach for smarter qualification using test data from the production line along with integrated computational techniques for data mining/analytics and data-driven forecasting (i.e.prognostics) modelling.The most common type of testing in the electronics industry-sequentially run electrical multi-parameter tests on the Device-under-Test (DUT), is considered.The proposed data mining (DM) framework can identify the tests that have strong correlation to pending failure of the device in the qualification (tests sensitive to pending failure) as well as to evaluate the similarity in test measurements, thus generating knowledge on potentially redundant tests.Mining the data in this context and with the proposed approach represents a major new contribution because it uncovers embedded knowledge and information in the production test data that can enable intelligent optimisation of the tests' sequence and reduce the number of tests.The intelligent manufacturing concept behind the development of data-driven prognostics models using machine learning techniques is to use data only from a small number of tests from the full qualification specification as training data in the process of model construction.This model can then forecast the overall qualification outcome for a DUT-Pass or Fail-without performing all other remaining tests.The novelty in the context of machine learning is in the selection of the data features for the training dataset using results from tests sensitive to pending failure.Support Vector Machine (SVM) binary classifiers SVM models built with data from tests sensitive to the outcome that the module will fail are shown to have superior performance compared with models trained with other datasets of tests.Case studies based on the use of real industrial production test data for an electronic module are included in the paper to demonstrate and validate the computational approach.This work is both novel and original because at present, to the best knowledge of the authors, such predictive analytics methodology applied to qualification testing and providing benefits of test time and hence cost reduction are non-existent in the electronics industry.The integrated data analytics-prognostics approach, deployable for both off-line and in-line optimisation of production test procedures, has the potential to transform current practices by exploiting in a smarter way information and knowledge available with large datasets of qualification test data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods
Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801389 · Cited by 13,855
An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel‐based Learning Methods
(2001) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k.2001.30.1.103.6 · Cited by 3,308
Working Set Selection Using Second Order Information for Training Support Vector Machines
Fan, R.-E., Chen, P.-H., & Lin, C. (2005) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1046920.1194907 · Cited by 1,403
Kusiak, A. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644 · Cited by 1,330
Ben‐Hur, A., Horn, D., Siegelmann, H. T., & Vapnik, V. N. (2002) · doi:10.5555/944790.944807 · Cited by 1,330
Data mining in manufacturing: a review based on the kind of knowledge
Choudhary, A. K., Harding, J. A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2009) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-008-0145-x · Cited by 494
Health assessment and life prediction of cutting tools based on support vector regression
Benkedjouh, T., Medjaher, K., Zerhouni, N., & Rechak, S. (2015) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0774-6 · Cited by 386
Wuest, T., Irgens, C., & Thoben, K.-D. (2014) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0761-y · Cited by 243
Cited by
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340 · Cited by 445
Industry 4.0 and the supply chain digitalisation: a blockchain diffusion perspective
Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, M. M. (2022) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1810756 · Cited by 298
Fang, W., Guo, Y., Liao, W., Ramani, K., & Huang, S. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1602744 · Cited by 109
(2023) · doi:10.1007/s00170-023-12692-4 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
- Published
- 2013-05-25
- ISSN
- 0956-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8145
- OpenAlex
- W4248245878
- Cited by
- 917
- References
- 14
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/10845.1572-8145
- The paper
- Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. (2013). Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/10845.1572-8145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.