The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alleviating the Sparsity Problem of Collaborative Filtering Using Trust Inferences
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Indexing by latent semantic analysis
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-9 · Cited by 12,751
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., & Riedl, J. T. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/963770.963772 · Cited by 5,798
Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering
Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2003.1167344 · Cited by 5,403
Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering
Breese, J. S., Heckerman, D. E., & Kadie, C. M. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.7363 · Cited by 4,772
On power-law relationships of the Internet topology
Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos, C. (1999) · Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication · doi:10.1145/316188.316229 · Cited by 4,196
Resnick, P., & Varian, H. R. (1997) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/245108.245121 · Cited by 3,772
Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “word of mouth”
Shardanand, U., & Maes, P. (1995) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223904.223931 · Cited by 2,823
An Algorithmic Framework for Performing Collaborative Filtering
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A., & Riedl, J. (2017) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3130348.3130372 · Cited by 2,512
An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A., & Riedl, J. (1999) · Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/312624.312682 · Cited by 2,011
Cited by
A Survey of Recommendation Systems: Recommendation Models, Techniques, and Application Fields
Ko, H., Lee, S., Park, Y., & Choi, A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11010141 · Cited by 658
News recommender systems – Survey and roads ahead
Karimi, M., Jannach, D., & Jugovac, M. (2018) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2018.04.008 · Cited by 336
A Comparison of Collaborative-Filtering Recommendation Algorithms for E-commerce
Huang, Z., Zeng, D., & Chen, H. (2007) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2007.4338497 · Cited by 299
Hasan, M., & Roy, F. (2019) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc3030039 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Papagelis, M., Plexousakis, D., & Kutsuras, T.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 224-239
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1589148151
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alleviating the Sparsity Problem of Collaborative Filtering Using Trust Inferences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/11429760_16
- The paper
- Papagelis, M., Plexousakis, D., & Kutsuras, T. (2005). Alleviating the Sparsity Problem of Collaborative Filtering Using Trust Inferences. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/11429760_16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.